Tatman Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Much as I dislike the man, I don't know why people knock him for getting rich, anybody else would do the same. Getting rich conflicts with the values hes supposed to hold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Getting rich conflicts with the values hes supposed to hold. Getting rich is the only value he holds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Much as I dislike the man, I don't know why people knock him for getting rich, anybody else would do the same. Atleast Blair made his own money, not handed to him by his rich folks and by marrying the daughter of a wealthy aristocrat like Cameron! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatman Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Getting rich is the only value he holds! Note my use of the word 'supposed'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Atleast Blair made his own money, not handed to him by his rich folks and by marrying the daughter of a wealthy aristocrat like Cameron! Ah well one can you do. Inequality is a fact of life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Was pretty much immediately denied - all that has happened is that his company have applied to be FSA registered. He apparently offers economic & financial advice, and there was a feeling he might cross over into the area where his advice becomes enough for him to have to be FSA registered, so they did it just in case.An ex Prime Minister offering economic and financial advice with the strength of his contacts,is always going to cross over into a grey area!.............especially with the Blairs pursuit of moneymaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worjackie Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Was pretty much immediately denied - all that has happened is that his company have applied to be FSA registered. He apparently offers economic & financial advice, and there was a feeling he might cross over into the area where his advice becomes enough for him to have to be FSA registered, so they did it just in case. If Bliar denies something that usually means it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 An ex Prime Minister offering economic and financial advice with the strength of his contacts,is always going to cross over into a grey area!.............especially with the Blairs pursuit of moneymaking. Atleast he's done nothing illegal unlike the Milk Snatchers son, Mark!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Atleast he's done nothing illegal unlike the Milk Snatchers son, Mark!!! Done nothing illegal ? Thats very arguable. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/27/letters-blair-vigilantes-religion-gaza plenty more where that came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Atleast he's done nothing illegal unlike the Milk Snatchers son, Mark!!!Err,do you think you ought to think again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.