cooljules Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 You will find that the majority of people don't join a group that waves burn in hell banners or support terrorist activities. If you have asian friends than they don't know you support the edl otherwise they woudn't be your friends anymore. Are you saying that most asians don't behave and respect the law but the ones you are friends with do? Anyone who says they support the edl is advertising the fact that they are of low intelligence by admiting supporting a group whose only aim is to cause trouble and participate in violence after getting tanked up on booze. im far from low intelligence, and yes my asian muslim friends know ( never hidden the fact) i see enough 'normal' people tanked up on booze causing violence each week and no im not one of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shy talk Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 It realy gets up my nose that the UAF get portrayed as the "good guys" in these clashes. This thing in Birmingham or wherever it is was mentioned on the radio today and they spoke to someone from the UAF -but not the EDL The UAF are a Socialist Workers Party front (a Labour fringe group), Martin Smith of UAF is the head of the SWP so they are for all intents and purposes one and the same thing. They are the type of people that dismiss our age of sexual consent laws as "reactionary" and want, in effect, to legalise paedophelia, lowering the the age of consent to 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 We should think of new names for EDF and UAF. I'll go first: EDL - Easily Duped Louts UAF - Unwashed And Filthy -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 It realy gets up my nose that the UAF get portrayed as the "good guys" in these clashes. This thing in Birmingham or wherever it is was mentioned on the radio today and they spoke to someone from the UAF -but not the EDL The UAF are a Socialist Workers Party front, Martin Smith of UAF is the head of the SWP so they are for all intents and purposes one and the same thing. They are the type of people that dismiss our age of sexual consent laws as "reactionary" and want to, in effect, legalise paedophelia, lowering the the age of consent to 12. Maybe they interviewer wanted an articulate contribution to the programme rather than the monosyllabic grunts which he would have got from an EDL spokesperson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 It realy gets up my nose that the UAF get portrayed as the "good guys" in these clashes. This thing in Birmingham or wherever it is was mentioned on the radio today and they spoke to someone from the UAF -but not the EDL The UAF are a Socialist Workers Party front (a Labour fringe group), Martin Smith of UAF is the head of the SWP so they are for all intents and purposes one and the same thing. They are the type of people that dismiss our age of sexual consent laws as "reactionary" and want, in effect, to legalise paedophelia, lowering the the age of consent to 12. oop there we go............at last, the UAF got mentioned why when talking about the EDL can people not resist mentioning the UAF anybody would theink they are mutally inclusive and like a married couple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 It realy gets up my nose that the UAF get portrayed as the "good guys" in these clashes. This thing in Birmingham or wherever it is was mentioned on the radio today and they spoke to someone from the UAF -but not the EDL The UAF are a Socialist Workers Party front (a Labour fringe group), Martin Smith of UAF is the head of the SWP so they are for all intents and purposes one and the same thing. They are the type of people that dismiss our age of sexual consent laws as "reactionary" and want, in effect, to legalise paedophelia, lowering the the age of consent to 12. Where is your evidence for this? Another question, why are so many paedos attracted to these far-right loony groups? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shy talk Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 oop there we go............at last, the UAF got mentioned why when talking about the EDL can people not resist mentioning the UAF anybody would theink they are mutally inclusive and like a married couple Isn't there a bit of a do today involving the EDL and UAF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 Where is your evidence for this? Another question, why are so many paedos attracted to these far-right loony groups? aswell as an attraction to weaponary and war memrobillia too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 Isn't there a bit of a do today involving the EDL and UAF? but this threads titled ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE not EDL and UAF discussion? on these threads it seems to me certain people that are sympathetic to the EDL ALWAYS bring up the UAF in the discussion to somehow change the course of the discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shy talk Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 Where is your evidence for this? Another question, why are so many paedos attracted to these far-right loony groups? Do a bit of Googling into socialism and age of sexual consent and I think you will find its the far left that is a bit dodgy on this issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.