mj.scuba Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 I watched this program over the weekend which I found both interesting and disturbing. I'd encourage you to watch it start to finish. For a country that is meant to guarantee freedom of religion by its constitution, they don't seem to be upholding it too well. -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number Six Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Is it discrimination of Christians or against Christians? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Is it discrimination of Christians or against Christians? Has to be against. 'Of' don't make no sense. It's a predominantly muslim country so there are bound to be problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted September 28, 2010 Author Share Posted September 28, 2010 Is it discrimination of Christians or against Christians? Sorry B Trautmann I don't follow, are those two different? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaphoria Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Is it discrimination of Christians or against Christians? I thought of. But I think it's a watch, listen and make your own mind up kind of thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaphoria Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Has to be against. 'Of' don't make no sense. It's a predominantly muslim country so there are bound to be problems. Well ''don't make no sense'' is interesting in itself. So are you saying that if a country is predominantly one religion, problems with minority religions are acceptable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaphoria Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 I'm rather confused. Isn't 'discrimination of', and 'discrimination against' the same thing? Or is there some grammatical law that sets the two apart? Where's Lord Chavelry when you need him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm rather confused. Isn't 'discrimination of', and 'discrimination against' the same thing? Or is there some grammatical law that sets the two apart? Where's Lord Chavelry when you need him? No they are not the same thing - at it was Lord Chaverly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm rather confused. Isn't 'discrimination of', and 'discrimination against' the same thing? Or is there some grammatical law that sets the two apart? Where's Lord Chavelry when you need him? Probably in the loo. Discrimination is discrimination. A quarter of four is one. Is a quarter against four one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamalJoe Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 its basically "against the....." Well don't be surprised as Christians are discriminated in Western world as well by the atheists and protestants......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.