Longcol Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Could it also enable them to remove or force a public forum to remove comments,threads and links that could support terrorists ?,or in other words expose the Government for what they are.(corrupt as hell) How is supporting terrorism exposing the government as corrupt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 How is supporting terrorism exposing the government as corrupt? Agreed ,but that seems to be the road they are going down. Quote from BBC article Other theories highlighted were that "freemasons control the world economy through manipulation of paper currency", that the UK government is "consciously seeking to destroy Islam" and that a "conspiracy between the Japanese government, the US, and the Jews existed to gain world domination". The study claims such theories are frequently adopted by extremist groups to demonise outsiders, discredit moderates and push them in a more extreme and sometimes violent direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulgarian Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Agreed Agreed ? It was a question, you're supposed to answer it. You really are oblivious to what everyone else is saying arn't you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 How is supporting terrorism exposing the government as corrupt? Ok,sorry, i meant ,what they see as supporting terrorism.for instance that could be someone like myself expressing an opinion,on 9/11 etc and providing links to back up what i say.It counteracts their own propaganda tactics,so could it be seen as supporting terrorism ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Agreed ,but that seems to be the road they are going down. Quote from BBC article Other theories highlighted were that "freemasons control the world economy through manipulation of paper currency", that the UK government is "consciously seeking to destroy Islam" and that a "conspiracy between the Japanese government, the US, and the Jews existed to gain world domination". The study claims such theories are frequently adopted by extremist groups to demonise outsiders, discredit moderates and push them in a more extreme and sometimes violent direction. The think tank proposals mentioned in the BBC article don't propose shutting down websites that carry these messages but using reasoned argument, more transparent government processes and education to counter them. Neither does the prison planet article. None of those "theories" infringe copyright etc because there is no evidence to support them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Ok,sorry, i meant ,what they see as supporting terrorism.for instance that could be someone like myself expressing an opinion,on 9/11 etc and providing links to back up what i say.It counteracts their own propaganda tactics,so could it be seen as supporting terrorism ? If a government really wanted to oppress people the first it would have picked on were those who exposed the reasons for invading Iraq as a sham, the people who exposed MP's expenses etc. Expressing opinions on SF will be way below their radar - it isn't that important or influential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 If a government really wanted to oppress people the first it would have picked on were those who exposed the reasons for invading Iraq as a sham, the people who exposed MP's expenses etc. Expressing opinions on SF will be way below their radar - it isn't that important or influential. Ok,i'm being a bit coy because i don't want another thread deleting,but i wonder if the '7/7 truth and lies' thread was deleted in connection to such laws.I suppose i'm reading between the lines on those links,as much as what they actually say. The truth would be far more damaging to their agenda than say the expenses scandal,if justice had been served on those robbing MPs then i might have more faith.I believe it was a con to make us believe corruption will be reported if exposed,to fool the likes of you and give you an argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 There seems to be a big gap between what the law says, and what you think it says. Yes i'm reading between the lines somewhat. It's not the first politically sensitive thread iv'e had deleted.(the others went within minutes of posting) Is there no such thing as free speech anymore ?if so fine but let's have some honesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 It appears so. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11123105 http://www.prisonplanet.com/death-of-the-internet-unprecedented-censorship-bill-passes-in-uk.html Why are they a danger if what they say is so easily debunked All they have to do is have an open honest debate on the issues. Truth Seekers already have their own very special laws that nobody else knows about. Evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulgarian Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 It's not the first politically sensitive thread iv'e had deleted.(the others went within minutes of posting) They are onto you - have you got the curtains closed and your telepathic wave blocking headwear on ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.