Cyclone Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 how would parents feel about their children having these images produced? in the name of safety please can we have naked images of your kids! o and please not forget the Detroit x-mas bomber was was allowed to board the plane with NO PASSPORT ( according to the passengers ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5FBCHKu2KU&feature=channel_video_title Fake colour images that aren't stored and are viewed by someone in another location. Can't see why they'd be that bothered to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Fake colour images that aren't stored and are viewed by someone in another location. Can't see why they'd be that bothered to be honest. no sir i would NOT want any sort of NAKED IMAGE OF MY CHILD OR ANY ONES ELSES CHILD! THIS AMOUNTS TO CHILD PORNOGRAPHY! GOVERNMENT SANCTION CHILD PORNOGRAPHY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 The Dutch counter-terror agency said that Abdulmutallab presented a valid Nigerian passport and U.S. entry visa when he boarded Flight 253 -wikipedia may be so, but passengers on the same plane ( one who was professorial lawyer ) all claimed he was let on board with out a passport! but i guess we will never know the truth as no cctv images of him boarding the plane have been realsed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 The Dutch counter-terror agency said that Abdulmutallab presented a valid Nigerian passport and U.S. entry visa when he boarded Flight 253 -wikipedia may be so, but passengers on the same plane ( one who was professorial lawyer ) all claimed he was let on board with out a passport! but i guess we will never know the truth as no cctv images of him boarding the plane have been released! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I told you once, stop with the all caps. And no it isn't porn, buy a dictionary. so having a naked picture of a CHILD generated on a computer screen is NOT pornography? is pornography a image ONLY recorded with the lense of a camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I told you once, stop with the all caps. And no it isn't porn, buy a dictionary. as far as i can see your post #260 is the only one asking me to stop with caps! were is the other one? or did you imagine telling me before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 so having a naked picture of a CHILD generated on a computer screen is NOT pornography? is pornography a image ONLY recorded with the lense of a camera? This is how wikipedia defines pornography Pornography or porn is the portrayal of explicit sexual subject matter for the purposes of sexual excitement and erotic satisfaction. Makes much more sense than your defenition of "anything with a naked child in it". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 How would I know what I was looking at?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 No, pornography is images made with the intent to titillate. If I were you, I would now be posting something about how you find images of children titillating, but since I'm not I won't. Other thread. You even quoted it, knew you didn't read the posts you quote. so creating a naked image of a child is NOT pornography as it is being used for security reasons not pleasure? right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthlogic Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 No, it is the reason for making them, not the use you put them to. As I said, porn has the intent of "turning you on". If you claim that the images are porn, you are claiming that they would turn you on. I believe ANY type of naked image of a child is pornography / exploitation / a CRIME! you believe as long as the image does NOT turn the vieweer on , it is ok you Think that as long as the Image is USed for Security reasons its Fine! enuff said! any one supporting images of Naked kids should be jailed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.