Conrod Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Socialism sounds fine till you leave Uni and then enter the real world!Beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
websters gue Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Socialism sounds fine till you leave Uni and then enter the real world! With £25,000 of debt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uptowngirl Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 With £25,000 of debt? It doesn't matter how bad things get here they will never be as bad as they get in socialist dictatorships because we get to vote them out of power just long enough to clear up the mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 It also assumes a production only economy, what about the service sector? When we go to the cinema, does the spotty kid checking my ticket own the cinema? Only own part of it? And which part of it? Do they "sell" "their share" to the next spotty kid when they leave? Public ownership of everything is nothing more than just a Utopian dream without any relationship to reality whatsoever although essential services vital to public well being such as electric power water and gas supply should be under some form of governmental control as if they are in privately owned hands or not at least under the scrutiny of a government appointed commission there could be unreasonable hikes in rates for these services and resulting hardship caused to the poor or lower wage earners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 New Labour certainly aren't Socialist any more, although they contain a wide spectrum of political opinion, as the Tories do. Socialism is most commonly defined as: "The ownership and operation of the means of production and distribution is by society or the community rather than by private individuals, with all members of society or the community sharing in the work and the products." I would defy you to find a single New Labour policy which fits these criteria, never mind the many needed to be able to call the New Labour party 'socialist'. Judge a party by its actions, not by what it calls itself. I think socialism is being confusd with communism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
espadrille Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 I think socialism is being confusd with communism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism See the end of the first paragraph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uptowngirl Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Public ownership of everything is nothing more than just a Utopian dream without any relationship to reality whatsoever Very true. There aren't armadas of rubber boats leaving Miami in an attempt to sneak into Cuba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dell12 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Whatever the pedantic insistances of some left-wingers, Labour was and continues to be a socialist party. It may have softened (a bit) round the edges, but that's what it is, and I think the shower of politicians who make the party's policy have more right to define its purpose than an armchair expert in Sheffield. But you still not defined what makes the (New) Labour Party Socialist, apart from what it calls itself. Sure it grew from the trade unions and certainly has a few socialist members (and perhaps even ex MPs), but I see nothing in it's actions which could possibly lead to it being construed as socialist any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 But you still not defined what makes the (New) Labour Party Socialist, apart from what it calls itself. Sure it grew from the trade unions and certainly has a few socialist members (and perhaps even ex MPs), but I see nothing in it's actions which could possibly lead to it being construed as socialist any more.Maybe if the last government had made a success of things instead of such an abysmal mess,I am sure you would have been glad to have called it a socialist government!.............but it was never going to happen and now we have to pay for 13 years of misguided/misdirected policies as we always have to under labour rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 what about the service sector? ? That's what the gulags provide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.