Tankerman Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 A womans work is never done anyhow because they do not work quick enough to complete it like men do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatman Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Well, there's nothing new in the Conservatives making women more equal. Margaret Thatcher had more balls than most of her opponents. Funny how the PM we had with the biggest balls sinse Churchill dint actualy have any. Well not unless you count Denis's which i hear she kept in her purse, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loubbe Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 A womans work is never done anyhow because they do not work quick enough to complete it like men do. You're brave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankerman Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 You're brave You're perceptive.:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted October 20, 2010 Author Share Posted October 20, 2010 What year did the state pension begin, don't think either of my grandparents had one, my grandma worked till she was 80. 1908 for the over 70s. Life expectancy was 40. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julado Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Conservatives to make women more equal!!!!! I hope not...I have no intention of coming down to the level of men Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 About time - can't believe it's been left so long. This coalition really has some balls to do these unpopular, essential things to get us out of the (Brown) mess we find ourselves up to our necks in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNCskilled Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Women live longer so are a bigger drain on our welfare budget. Raising their retirement age to 66 is a big step in the right direction but, considering the amount of years men have had to work longer in the past, I think they should eventually raise it to 71 for women. Its only fair. They can still toodle about in a shop or sit and type at that age without much physical effort. We need Cameron to grow a pair and make even harder decisions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loubbe Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Women live longer so are a bigger drain on our welfare budget. Raising their retirement age to 66 is a big step in the right direction but, considering the amount of years men have had to work longer in the past, I think they should eventually raise it to 71 for women. Its only fair. They can still toodle about in a shop or sit and type at that age without much physical effort. We need Cameron to grow a pair and make even harder decisions Not that you're generalising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Women live longer so are a bigger drain on our welfare budget. Raising their retirement age to 66 is a big step in the right direction but, considering the amount of years men have had to work longer in the past, I think they should eventually raise it to 71 for women. Its only fair. They can still toodle about in a shop or sit and type at that age without much physical effort. We need Cameron to grow a pair and make even harder decisions Perhaps men should be paid less as they're less able to multi-task then women? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.