Ms Macbeth Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Please try and debate the topic without resorting to personal insults. Some posts of this nature and their replies have already been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I was bored so .... http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1271/cameroncm.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I was bored so .... http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1271/cameroncm.jpg Sounds like he's been to the Gordon Brown finishing school! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I didn't say we shouldn't have bailed them out. What I an saying is that after bailing them out, it shouldn't be us picking up the pieces of the mess they caused. Even Boris Johnson is appalled they are likely to be paying out £7billion in bonuses, whilst we suffer the consequences. Neither should we be picking up the mess of failed relationships where kids are left behind to suffer the consequences.Labour has encouraged single parent families at a huge cost to all of us.Kids need two parents so at least one can work to support the family instead of a single parent relying on the state for a living!The moral irresponsibility and selfishness encouraged over the last decade to breed indiscriminately knowing the state will pick up the tab for your actions is disgraceful ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vague_Boy Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 The Government keeps going on about us all being in this together Nope, you're the one that keeps going on about it, mainly because it deflects attention from the tsunami of red ink that is currently swamping the country. Definition of the straw man argument: To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position. LINK When will you start talking about the real issues behind the spending review, the fact that the UK has to borrow £155 billion annually just to pay its bills (the deficit), never mind addressing the ever increasing national debt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Nope, you're the one that keeps going on about it, mainly because it deflects attention from the tsunami of red ink that is currently swamping the country. Definition of the straw man argument: LINK When will you start talking about the real issues behind the spending review, the fact that the UK has to borrow £155 billion annually just to pay its bills (the deficit), never mind addressing the ever increasing national debt. We are hearing nothing new or of substance from the Labour benches! only that whatever the Coalition has suggested,they would do it slower......................of course you would! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I was bored so .... http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1271/cameroncm.jpg So was I... http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/cameron.php?poster=531143 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanic99 Posted October 24, 2010 Author Share Posted October 24, 2010 When will you start talking about the real issues behind the spending review, the fact that the UK has to borrow £155 billion annually just to pay its bills (the deficit), never mind addressing the ever increasing national debt. Real issue of the day is the country was worth 3 Trillion when Labour came to power, it is now worth between 7 and 9 Trillion, so let's use some of the money made by a few of the people who have profited the most, in order to get the debt down. Difficult that it might seem to you, but some of us find it quite nauseating that this shower of a Government would rather take money from those who need it most, instead of those that can spare quite a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanic99 Posted October 24, 2010 Author Share Posted October 24, 2010 We are hearing nothing new or of substance from the Labour benches! only that whatever the Coalition has suggested,they would do it slower......................of course you would! I think you'll find that they would go for a 50/50 split between Tax and custs as opposed to the 80/20 ratio. Not enough for me but better than this shower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Vader Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I was bored so .... http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1271/cameroncm.jpg Me too.... http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/cameron.php?poster=531144 ....Loving that link, thanks, Mecky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.