Jump to content

Geert Wilders Trial collapses: retrail ordered


Recommended Posts

Once again "What did Wilders say that brought the charges?"

 

I'm not exactly privy to what the prosecution said, but let's say it was along the lines of using (deliberate) offensive language towards Islam and Muslims.

 

It's clear that that vile Islamophobe has an agenda which involves disparaging Muslims and their Faith at every given opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not exactly privy to what the prosecution said, but let's say it was along the lines of using (deliberate) offensive language towards Islam and Muslims.

 

It's clear that that vile Islamophobe has an agenda which involves disparaging Muslims and their Faith at every given opportunity.

 

But they would find it offensive because it was said about their religion, but that isn't (shouldn't be) a sound enough grounding for arresting and prosecuting people for what they've said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they would find it offensive because it was said about their religion, but that isn't (shouldn't be) a sound enough grounding for arresting and prosecuting people for what they've said.

 

If his words (or actions) lead to public disorder, then it's only right the Islamophobe is arrested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If his words (or actions) lead to public disorder, then it's only right the Islamophobe is arrested.

 

It's fairly difficult to say anything critical of Islam without the threat of violence looming, the irony being perhaps that's one reason why people are critical.

 

It's still not a good enough reason to stifle free speech, just because the followers of a religion and political ideology are offended when anybody dare criticise it, and thankfully that is what the result of the trial has established. Criticising Islam is not illegal (for the Dutch at least).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If his words (or actions) lead to public disorder, then it's only right the Islamophobe is arrested.

 

If his words led to a public disorder.

You don't really know what you're talking about do you, you're acting like a Westernerphobe/Israeliaphobe and jumping the gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bassman62

Once again "What did Wilders say that brought the charges?"

 

The so called expert on Geert Wilders replied

 

I'm not exactly privy to what the prosecution said, but let's say it was along the lines of using (deliberate) offensive language towards Islam and Muslims.It's clear that that vile Islamophobe has an agenda which involves disparaging Muslims and their Faith at every given opportunity.

 

My bold= what a load of waffle:loopy:. Did he call his Piggy Jack Mohamed or write a book like Rushdie?

 

It was published what Widers said that brought the charges, maybe if you did a little more research instead of going off half **** with your usual ramblings you'd have more credibility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fairly difficult to say anything critical of Islam without the threat of violence looming, the irony being perhaps that's one reason why people are critical.

 

It's still not a good enough reason to stifle free speech, just because the followers of a religion and political ideology are offended when anybody dare criticise it, and thankfully that is what the result of the trial has established. Criticising Islam is not illegal (for the Dutch at least).

 

There's absolutely nothing wrong in voicing constructive criticism of anything, but when that becomes malicious and full of hate, then that's where the Law must step in.

 

If his words led to a public disorder.

You don't really know what you're talking about do you, you're acting like a Westernerphobe/Israeliaphobe and jumping the gun.

 

Being malicious towards anyone, whether it be (towards) their Faith or anything else, is a crime.

 

Just like slander or libel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's absolutely nothing wrong in voicing constructive criticism of anything, but when that becomes malicious and full of hate, then that's where the Law must step in.

 

 

 

Being malicious towards anyone, whether it be (towards) their Faith or anything else, is a crime.

 

Just like slander or libel.

You've virtualy admitted that you don't what you're talking about, all this waffle doesn't answer why you're posting on a topic you know nothing about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've virtualy admitted that you don't what you're talking about, all this waffle doesn't answer why you're posting on a topic you know nothing about.

 

The fact is that an Islamophobe was arrested (and hopefully will be convicted) for his vile and despicable views on over a billion people on the planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.