daftlad Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Just been on sky this lunchtime that smarmy daves personal photographer has been put on the governments payroll at a cost to us taxpayers of 35K a year. Just remember as smary dave says we are all in this together. Nice work if you can get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/nov/03/david-cameron-defend-appointment-personal-photographer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 So they're saving money by scrapping a more expensive communications and publicity department and using this guy instead? Seems like common sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daftlad Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 So they're saving money by scrapping a more expensive communications and publicity department and using this guy instead? Seems like common sense to me. jobs for the boys thougheh, i wonder how many other photographers were interviewed for the job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 jobs for the boys thougheh, i wonder how many other photographers were interviewed for the job They most probably knew this photographer was the most suitable for the job because of his proven experiece, personality, photographic ability and style. His ability to relate to the Camerons will have been important. Why go through the charade of interviewing others ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 So they're saving money by scrapping a more expensive communications and publicity department and using this guy instead? Seems like common sense to me. Where does it say that on the article? It says: 'Cameron responded that his government was slashing Labour's spending on communications and publicity' - but Cameron doesn't say how he is going to do it. The article also says that 12 people will be transferred form the Tory payroll onto civil service contracts. Good job we're all in this together indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 So they're saving money by scrapping a more expensive communications and publicity department and using this guy instead? Seems like common sense to me. I was thinking it was probably something of this nature. A photographer for a prime minister does not seem ridiculous, Im sure everyone else has had something similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Where does it say that on the article? It says: 'Cameron responded that his government was slashing Labour's spending on communications and publicity' - but Cameron doesn't say how he is going to do it. The article also says that 12 people will be transferred form the Tory payroll onto civil service contracts. Good job we're all in this together indeed! again, so what? Its not like every other employer would go with someone they know before someone they don't-its common sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitch_1980 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 again, so what? Its not like every other employer would go with someone they know before someone they don't-its common sense. Common sense has gone out the window these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Common sense has gone out the window these days. I think common sense is returning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.