INTERVIEWER Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 But what you seem to be ignoring is the benefit of the routine of the job, not the actual job itself. Why cant people just get this?? Ah, the imaginary 'benefit of the routine of doing manual labour', without the actual real world benefit of being adequately compensated for one's graft! Truly the Tory/Lib Dem way - work WITHOUT adequate pay! I can imagine a 'non-volunteer' doing the soul destroying manual job of litter picking, handling and disposing of dirty needles while thinking about how the routine of work is really beneficial to them, especially as they only get less than £2 an hour... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Ah, the imaginary 'benefit of the routine of doing manual labour', without the actual real world benefit of being adequately compensated for one's graft! Truly the Tory/Lib Dem way - work WITHOUT adequate pay! I can imagine a 'non-volunteer' doing the soul destroying manual job of litter picking, handling and disposing of dirty needles while thinking about how the routine of work is really beneficial to them, especially as they only get less than £2 an hour... They're getting their housing paid for as well, which all adds up. If they want a higher rate, they can try getting a job, heaven forbid we might force the poor poppets to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discodown Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 demand that the unemployed do manual work for less than £2 per hour!No they don'tWhy do the Tories/Lib Dems believe that manual workers should be paid less than £2 per hour?they don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Ah, the imaginary 'benefit of the routine of doing manual labour', without the actual real world benefit of being adequately compensated for one's graft! Truly the Tory/Lib Dem way - work WITHOUT adequate pay! I can imagine a 'non-volunteer' doing the soul destroying manual job of litter picking, handling and disposing of dirty needles while thinking about how the routine of work is really beneficial to them, especially as they only get less than £2 an hour... Have you read any of the earlier posts ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
espadrille Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 The unemployed don't get subsidised bus passes. What on earth made you think that they did? They have to pay for their day-to-day travel in just the same way as those in employment. You live in a Tory inspired fantasy land, where reality rarely intrudes. I truly despair. No we live in the real world of small business where one can wait 2 months for an invoice to be paid. That is when you can really despair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
espadrille Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Ah, the imaginary 'benefit of the routine of doing manual labour', without the actual real world benefit of being adequately compensated for one's graft! Truly the Tory/Lib Dem way - work WITHOUT adequate pay! I can imagine a 'non-volunteer' doing the soul destroying manual job of litter picking, handling and disposing of dirty needles while thinking about how the routine of work is really beneficial to them, As I said you really dont get it. For some people taking a step forward isnt just about money, it is about getting the experience of changing their lives. I guess those with tunnel vision are just not able to see that though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Have you read any of the earlier posts ?I don't think INTERVIEWER is reading anything but his own rhetoric, and repeating the fallacious mantra of £2 per hour! Strange behaviour for an interviewer, who is actually only supposed to do one third of the talking and two thirds of the listening! Has he actually ever had an interview, do you suppose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
espadrille Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Have you read any of the earlier posts ? I hope to goodness that he/she never 'Interviews" me:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 Interviewer may hold the opinion that if you keep people unemployed they will be secure labour votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 I hope to goodness that he/she never 'Interviews" me:hihi: He would never have the opportunity as he is unable to form an objective viewpoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.