skinz Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I'm sure that it's an infringement of human rights to smash somebody on the head with a placard or put their windows through and obviously a peaceful protest that didn't need policing wouldn't incur costs. That's the whole point of a judicial system. If you're caught offending then you'll be brought before a judge who will decide if removing you from society or imposing costs is apt. Why should I pay a penalty for someone else's stupidity? If the demo is peaceful do we get a rebate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Bourne Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Or the weekend punchups and cleanups on West street? Shouldn't the universities and / or the breweries pay for that? x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Or the weekend punchups and cleanups on West street? Shouldn't the universities and / or the breweries pay for that? x some nightclubs DO pay for policing dont they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Bourne Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 some nightclubs DO pay for policing dont they? I don't know, I'm just caught up in the moment x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted November 24, 2010 Author Share Posted November 24, 2010 Or a Royal wedding, or a visit by some politician...maybe they should pay for the costs of policing as well? I was under the impression that the State does pay for State occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I was under the impression that the State does pay for State occasions. out of taxpayers money i should imagine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 How many more times must it be explained to you why he could not implement his manifesto ? The Guardian article showed that Clegg knew two months BEFORE the election that he would have to drop his 'no tuition fees' policy in the event of a ConDem coalition. How many time does it have to be explained to you that Clegg is a LIAR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I'm all for the right to make your voice heard but draw the line at violence against person or property. So, considering that the costs of today's student protest will run into millions should the National Union of Students* be getting a bill for the damage and policing costs? *My assumption, if the organiser is somebody else please mention it. I think that would run into a number of problems as todays demo in Sheffield demostrated. The police numbers, dog vans, helicopter, dozens of police vehicles was a complete and utter overkill for a few hundred perfectly well behaved protestors who caused no damage to people or property. Would it be fair for well behaved demostrators to fund police overtime when the officer in charge has clearly gone for complete overkill policing? What might be a good idea to ensure that the innocent have their right to protest but troublemakers pay their share of the costs would be a tweak in the law to make certain offences committed at these organised events aggrevated and make the agrrevating factor lead to a substancial addition fine element in the punishment. For example you could have an additional £5,000 fine for organised criminal damage or additional £1,0000 fine for organised affray. This would help to make the policing as revenue neutral as possible when violence does occur but not penalise law abiding protestors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 How many more times must it be explained to you why he could not implement his manifesto ? But both Libdems and Tories said they had no plans to raise VAT. But they did. Both parties campaigned to reverse the increase in National Insurance. But it's still going up. Sometime or another both parties are going to have to stop blaming each other for their manifesto lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 For example you could have an additional £5,000 fine for organised criminal damage or additional £1,0000 fine for organised affray. This would help to make the policing as revenue neutral as possible when violence does occur but not penalise law abiding protestors. at a pound a week say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.