rubydazzler Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 not so simple unless they've got two British passports in different names. Seems like a lot of effort for 50 kwid a week. Another one who likes to stereotype communities with things they dreamt up the night before. ermmm ... who said this? vvv Originally Posted by Bounce The figures class self employed Pakistani and Bangladeshi males as unemployed which is why the figures are high. For example all Pakistani taxi drivers in Sheffield are classed as unemployed. How does that work then? Please explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bounce Posted December 3, 2010 Author Share Posted December 3, 2010 ermmm ... who said this? vvv How does that work then? Please explain. Conrod was trying to imply that Pakistani taxi drivers sign on in one name and drive a cab in another. Impossible unless they've got two British passports in two different names. I don't know I read it in a university text book some years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 Conrod was trying to imply [...] I think that was purely because of your post which Suffy picked up on, wasn't it? I don't know I read it in a university text book some years ago If you don't know something for a fact, and can't even provide a reputable source, why try to use it to stereotype a whole section of the working population? Taxi drivers have to have a licence from the local council, insurance, tax and a radio hired from a ph company. Just for starters. So there's no way that they can be counted as being unemployed. I think you must have misunderstood what you read in a university textbook, some years ago. As they say "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 I think that was purely because of your post which Suffy picked up on, wasn't it? If you don't know something for a fact, and can't even provide a reputable source, why try to use it to stereotype a whole section of the working population? Taxi drivers have to have a licence from the local council, insurance, tax and a radio hired from a ph company. Just for starters. So there's no way that they can be counted as being unemployed. I think you must have misunderstood what you read in a university textbook, some years ago. As they say "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" My bold= I don't see you saying this to the usual suspects when they are stereotyping muslims, hmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 Or, as many do, JSA in one name, cab in another. Simples stop chatting ****, the council and social regularly do stop checks together to see if anyone is doing this and the police do it in unison with the social to van drivers, truckers etc aswell when they set up checkpoints up and down the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bounce Posted December 3, 2010 Author Share Posted December 3, 2010 I think that was purely because of your post which Suffy picked up on, wasn't it? If you don't know something for a fact, and can't even provide a reputable source, why try to use it to stereotype a whole section of the working population? Taxi drivers have to have a licence from the local council, insurance, tax and a radio hired from a ph company. Just for starters. So there's no way that they can be counted as being unemployed. I think you must have misunderstood what you read in a university textbook, some years ago. As they say "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" yes like some people on this forum who misunderstand after reading about Islam or Muslims in some tabloid but that doesn't stop them typing their bile does it. As they say 'A little knowledge is a dangerous thing' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 My bold= I don't see you saying this to the usual suspects when they are stereotyping muslims, hmmm I have no idea what you're implying with that comment but we're not talking about Muslims in this particular post Bounce posted a nonsensical comment about SELF employed Pakistani and Bangladeshi men being counted as UNemployed and that all Sheffield taxi drivers who happen to be Pakistani or of Pakistani descent are also considered as being unemployed. Thus making an open goal for Conrad to slot a sarcastic comment into. But Bounce isn't trying to stereotype Pakistani men with this ludicrous statement? I am merely attemping to point out that taxi driving is a profession with very strict regulations for its practitioners and that there is no way that they can ever be classed as being UNemployed. Do you disagree with that statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mort Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 Now totally off-topic so closing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.