hard2miss Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Danot...... They would be firing on sight at people who choose to throw missiles which could blind.mame.even kill someone who is trying to do a job that they get payed to do.And given all the bricks and stones thrown, how many people are left maimed, blind or dead in the police ranks ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Are you condoning the students actions today? And faulting the police. I think the police should have acted quicker and harder!!! Are you advocating shooting protesters ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clubfut Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 And given all the bricks and stones thrown, how many people are left maimed, blind or dead in the police ranks ? At least 6 seriously injured bobbies the last i heard could be more now. Use rubber bullets (baton rounds) and high pressure hoses, would soon sort the crowds!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfs-001 Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 What the originator of the thread is proposing will become reality if these stupid left wing students dont play the game by the rules. Martial law is when the Army take over where the Police failed. The worst thing that a demonstration can do is turn ugly, NEVER let the heat of the moment carry you away. You immediately change from a noble person demanding change to a THUG.... Martial law at demonstrations will become a reality if people don't keep their cool. No one listens to a person shouting but people will strain to hear the voice of wisdom. The automatic reaction in conflict is to respond with conflict, if you dont let it get that far and intelligently state your claims, then you will be listened to. NEVER TURN A PROTEST INTO A RIOT - YOU ARE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THEIR HANDS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayfair Posted December 10, 2010 Author Share Posted December 10, 2010 Marbles. .. You need to read and learn to understand. I said open fire on people causing danger to others. For example somebody swinging a plank of wood towards a police officers head should be shot and shown that this will not be stood for. Or another example somebody who throws a brick into a building when there is somebody in there trying to work who could be killed by that same brick. .. Do you agree with that. I am knly giving examples i have seen on t.v today and there are loads more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clubfut Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Napalm sounds good to me looking at the news at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Is it time we gave up.the idea of having police trying to.control.these violent thugs as seen in recent student demos. These people clearly have no fear of police so lets try the army with loaded weapons and see if they throw missiles at them and taunt them into acts of violence i would love to see them what they deserve a good old fashioned pasting. Anyone who chooses to participate in endangering peoples lives should be met with one thing. .Brute force. Lets leave policing to the police, and soldiering to the soldiers. It's not a difficult concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clubfut Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Lets leave policing to the police, and soldiering to the soldiers. It's not a difficult concept. But when the police fail let the army finish the job short sharp and hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Napalm sounds good to me looking at the news at the moment. Once those sweaty unwashed anarchists start to burn they would have to dig Red Adair up to put the fire out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Marbles. .. You need to read and learn to understand. I said open fire on people causing danger to others. For example somebody swinging a plank of wood towards a police officers head should be shot and shown that this will not be stood for. Or another example somebody who throws a brick into a building when there is somebody in there trying to work who could be killed by that same brick. .. Do you agree with that. I am knly giving examples i have seen on t.v today and there are loads more.Maybe batons and trampled under horses don'e hurt, maybe that bloke who was walking home at the G20 protest that was beat to death by police doesn't matter ? look the state are there to serve the people, if their is unrest then its because they are failing in their duty. I don't condone anyone throwing stones but you were not down on the ground being 'kettled' crushed and stopped from exercising your right to protest. What you propose will just make the next protesters that come after them will be armed and then where it end ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.