azazel666 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Oh and you need to take out the ones that aren't sex offenders!! Jeez!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VideoPro Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Completely different situation. And I am sure I don't need to explain why. You really should explain. See the post by spindrift immediately above yours. BNP, EDL, NF, are racists, terrorists and nonces. Stop apologizing for these people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azazel666 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You really should explain. See the post by spindrift immediately above yours. BNP, EDL, NF, are racists, terrorists and nonces. Stop apologizing for these people. Well, when right wingers slam the "loony left", that is akin to the lefties calling the right wingers "fascists", or "bigoted". It is not the same as tarring all people of one political stance on the actions of one......seemed like a no brainer to me man. Gonna leave racists out of the argument for the moment, cus that is for another day....but still waiting on ANY proof that a sizable percentage are nonces, and as for terrorists.........no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VideoPro Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 ....but still waiting on ANY proof that a sizable percentage are nonces, and as for terrorists.........no. 1.See the OP. 2. That bloke who nail bombed a well known gay bar in London's Soho district, couple of years ago plus several instances of other fruitcakes that are well documented in the press and on several threads here? Yep. I'm calling it now - terrorism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azazel666 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 1.See the OP. 2. That bloke who nail bombed a well known gay bar in London's Soho district, couple of years ago plus several instances of other fruitcakes that are well documented in the press and on several threads here? Yep. I'm calling it now - terrorism. Do I need to dig out a definition of "sizeable percentage"? I really don't like causing a fuss on here but really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhs1 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Want a bet? Yes. Bet you a fiver you can't prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 1.See the OP. 2. That bloke who nail bombed a well known gay bar in London's Soho district, couple of years ago plus several instances of other fruitcakes that are well documented in the press and on several threads here? Yep. I'm calling it now - terrorism. The op concerned one bloke. One bloke is not a majority of nonces. Can't stand the edl personaly but i'm also not a fan of liars either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Do I need to dig out a definition of "sizeable percentage"? I really don't like causing a fuss on here but really. So do you also accept that there isn't a sizeable percentage of Muslim terrorists then as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Do I need to dig out a definition of "sizeable percentage"? I really don't like causing a fuss on here but really. Why are you defending right wing extremist paedophiles? Can you name another political party with so many kiddy fiddlers in their ranks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azazel666 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Why are you defending right wing extremist paedophiles? Can you name another political party with so many kiddy fiddlers in their ranks? Why are you making ridiculous claims that you cannot back up? You even did that again stating that I am defending paedophiles. Now that I take exception to. I am not going to answer the question because I don't know the answer nor profess to do so......That's just deflecting the fact that you were wrong in the first instance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.