Bassman62 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Apparently now its ok to download images of child abuse because it 'could have been worse'....And you think marrying a little girl is not worse than looking at a picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 And you think marrying a little girl is not worse than looking at a picture. You think evidence from hundreds of years after the event is rock solid. :loopy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 And you think marrying a little girl is not worse than looking at a picture. You do know that the age of consent was 10 here in the latter half of the 16th century? So it's almost certain that you're condemning every one of your male relatives of that era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 And you think marrying a little girl is not worse than looking at a picture. ..but it was from a different time wasn't it? Nobody (with any sense) would condone a relationship between an adult and a child now, apart from Richard Price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You do know that the age of consent was 10 here in the latter half of the 16th century? So it's almost certain that you're condemning every one of your male relatives of that era.Yes but life expectancy was only 12. Whereas Mohamed was a grown up man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Yes but life expectancy was only 12. Ha ha! When? Your knowledge of history is a sshaky as your knowledge of terrorism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You think evidence from hundreds of years after the event is rock solid. :loopy:Well the muslims do, to question it is Blasphemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Well the muslims do, to question it is Blasphemy. No, they don't, there are other sources that state Aisha was 19. Every time you post on religion you demonstrate your ignorance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 No, they don't, there are other sources that state Aisha was 19. Every time you post on religion you demonstrate your ignorance. Show us the other scources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Ibn Hajar reported that Fatima, Mohammed’s daughter, was born when Mohammed was 35 years old, which would make her five years older the A’isha. That would make A’isha 15/16 years old when they consummated their marriage. (Al-isabah fi tamyizi'l-sahabah, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Vol 4, Pg 377, Arabic, Maktabatu'l-Riyadh al-haditha, al-Riyadh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.