Halibut Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I don't think you really believe that. BAN HIM! :hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Not sniping, and really trying to be as lighthearted as possible, although that always falls flat on its face when you need to declare the fact beforehand, but does this mean that moderators are exempt from the requirement to write posts that are I have to say I'd never spotted that clause in the rules - it's a weird one doncha think? It's a bit odd to qualify that a fact must a true one to be sure. What is an untrue fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernStar Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Perhaps if people knew who forum antagonists really were they'd not feel so intimidated by them. Here's one, we should pity them really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcoblog Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 It's a bit odd to qualify that a fact must a true one to be sure. What is an untrue fact? See post #121 Cyclone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamf Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Just checking, does this mean we have to have a signature. Or should it say, not have a signature which contains more than three colours (including black.) "Dogs must be carried on the escalator"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 It's a bit odd to qualify that a fact must a true one to be sure. What is an untrue fact? SWAG: one held by the genuine opinion-bearer as the fact underpinning their opinion, until it is proven to be untrue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Until it's proven to be untrue though they are posting based on facts (as they understand them). And subsequently it would no longer be a fact (as it's been proven to be untrue)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Until it's proven to be untrue though they are posting based on facts (as they understand them).Correct. And subsequently it would no longer be a fact (as it's been proven to be untrue)...Correct. The oxymoron that is an 'untrue fact' has an inherent expiry date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 So ultimately we're not permitted to express genuinely held opinions unless the facts that they are based upon have been proven to be true facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 So ultimately we're not permitted to express genuinely held opinions unless the facts that they are based upon have been proven to be true facts.So says Rule 14 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...that's going to be some server storage volume recovered, once the thread/posts spring cleaning is finished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.