pb1977 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 That's a good point then. Did the lady in the white coat who is smiling at you tell you to write that? Which when translated into english means, i can't answer that point because i know my idea is totally flawed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Which when translated into english means, i can't answer that point because i know my idea is totally flawed. I think you ought to read the OP again - he is talking about re-distributing wealth from rich to poor - not taking assets off the poorest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHYTOT Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 That's a good point then. Did the lady in the white coat who is smiling at you tell you to write that? Hi Phil. Another slack day that you've filled by trolling. How many times have you used that line? Gosh that one takes me back to philanthrop and philander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pb1977 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I think you ought to read the OP again - he is talking about re-distributing wealth from rich to poor - not taking assets off the poorest. No i think the OP is talking about the state taking the assets away from people upon their death and not been able to pass them on to family members. Or are we now saying that rich people can't pass on their assets up on death but poor people even though their assets would most likely be of a very very low value can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny11 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Something tells me the OP parents have left him nothing and he wants to vent his angry towards everyone, We work hard for a living so our kids dont have to, you should be aiming your anger at your parents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epiphany Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 We work hard for a living so our kids dont have to That's a bit daft. I want my parents to enjoy every penny they have before they die. I'm quite capable of working hard and making my own money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 greed greed greed me me me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discodown Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I think you ought to read the OP again - he is talking about re-distributing wealth from rich to poor - not taking assets off the poorest.No he isn't. He's talking about not allowing anyone to pass an inheritance on. That would then include the poorest members of society Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordChaverly Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Much of the north is also a net beneficiary from wealth re-distribution from the City and the south east. This is of course true, but the North is an integral part of England, not a separate country and therefore its position is qualitatively different from that Scotland (many of whose citizens aspire to leave the Union and who already enjoy various financial perks denied to English citizens, thanks to the budgetary largesse bestowed upon them). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carosio Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 That can soon be dealt with by legislation and policing. Gifts do not need to be in the form of money, they can be cars, furniture, jewelry, horses, anything. I was under the impression that giving was a way of re-distributing wealth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.