mattleonard Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 It is not a communist plan as the money from estates would not be shared equally amongst everybody, it would be used to fight poverty and crime, both of which would be quickly greatly reduced. There are no flaws either. It is a perfect plan. I think history shows that in general communist plans do result in the money from estates not being shared equally amongst everybody. So I'm not sure your distinction applies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattleonard Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 WOW...that is excellent! We should adopt it here! It is not Bill Gates money anyhow. It was earned by the people who work for him. It rightfully belongs to the American people. "work for him" - that's the key phrase. You see, those people have this thing called a "salary", which Bill Gates' company, Microsoft, pays in return for them working for him. They are not coerced to work for him, and are actually entitled to not work for him and instead start their own software company to compete with him. In fact, some American people don't work for Microsoft, and so are not rightfully entitled to any recompense from Microsoft for their non-work for them. Likewise, some people who work for Microsoft are not "American people" and do deserve some recompense for their work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 A fine communist plan with only several major flaws.No more than any other communist concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.