Kaimani Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 The iraqis could go to Iran or Syria, the Afghanis could to Paklistan where their Taleban terrorist cousins are holed up. Get out a map and tell us how many countries they cross to get to soft touch UK. These false Refugee/Asylum seekers pay on average £4000 each to get to the UK. they go to all these places AND here. the whole world has the duty to take care of those fleeing persecution. they cross many countries, yes, but when they're here the country has the duty to care for them. no government, even BNP i don't think is going to opt out of this. to be fair, i don't think you can fault people for escaping war, to wherever. and it does tend to be that people escape to places they are at war with-the Japanese to Hawaii and the states, the Germans too etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upinwath Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 You'd only have to catch one a week to make a steady living. I could easily live 4 or 5 months on every one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Cheers troll Oh, please inform on your mates illegal status! Your arguments don't add up and are generally quite hypocritical when viewed across multiple threads! :hihi: reminds me of the old kid's saying about being careful that when you point at people more of your own fingers are pointing back at you. ps-it would be an interesting experiment to do a quick poll, not that it'd be allowed, to see how many people on this forum you didn't agree with you called 'stupid', told to 'grow up' or called trolls. bassman has pretty much disagreed with everything i have to say but has not made any snide personal attacks or called me names. just stuck to discussing the issue. take lessons from him. anyway, let's get back on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 :hihi: reminds me of the old kid's saying about being careful that when you point at people more of your own fingers are pointing back at you. ps-it would be an interesting experiment to do a quick poll, not that it'd be allowed, to see how many people on this forum you didn't agree with you called 'stupid', told to 'grow up' or called trolls. bassman has pretty much disagreed with everything i have to say but has not made any snide personal attacks or called me names. just stuck to discussing the issue. take lessons from him. anyway, let's get back on topic. Yeah but you have! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 they go to all these places AND here. the whole world has the duty to take care of those fleeing persecution.Why should it? If a region has problems, that region should sort them. It should not be the responsibility of European nations to deal with the mess Asian and African states make of themselves. Their neighbouring countries should take the burden and we should not accept a single one - not even one - from another continent. they cross many countries, yes, but when they're here the country has the duty to care for them.Yes they do - and as soon as they cross one safe country to get here, they demonstrate that they are economic migrants, not asylum seekers. and it does tend to be that people escape to places they are at war with-the Japanese to Hawaii and the states, the Germans too etc.Indeed - people go to where they think they can cash in best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Why should it? If a region has problems, that region should sort them. It should not be the responsibility of European nations to deal with the mess Asian and African states make of themselves. Their neighbouring countries should take the burden and we should not accept a single one - not even one - from another continent. Yes they do - and as soon as they cross one safe country to get here, they demonstrate that they are economic migrants, not asylum seekers. Indeed - people go to where they think they can cash in best. Why should it? If a region has problems, that region should sort them. It should not be the responsibility of European nations to deal with the mess Asian and African states make of themselves. Their neighbouring countries should take the burden and we should not accept a single one - not even one - from another continent. the neighboring countries ALWAYS take most of the refugees. always. pretty rich saying the mess they make of themselves when the British army is doing the bombing and things in Iraq and Afghanistan. not too much to ask that we take some of the people that flee. people from french africa have always fled to France, dutch Africa the same and Portuguese africa the same. no different for england. read the commonwealth constitution. it does allow for anyone in the commonwealth to flee to anywhere in the commonwealth. the least the country coulda done. will get back to answering in a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radar Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Why should it? If a region has problems, that region should sort them. It should not be the responsibility of European nations to deal with the mess Asian and African states make of themselves. Best example of feigning ignorance on this forum:) The mess is largely created by the outside powers in almost all of the conflict zones where people flee from. Generally in every conflict Europe and USA have a direct or indirect hand in. The French in parts of Africa, the Americans and the British in Afghanistan and Iraq etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Yeah but you have! have what, spooky? please, just go back onto the topic. things like yesterday, going all the way to another thread 'the non-religious people one' just to post one thing harassing me but not saying anything pertinent just makes you, or the character you're playing on here, look like the needy kid in the corner playing with himself to get a bit of attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Best example of feigning ignorance on this forum:) The mess is largely created by the outside powers in almost all of the conflict zones where people flee from. Generally in every conflict Europe and USA have a direct or indirect hand in. The French in parts of Africa, the Americans and the British in Afghanistan and Iraq etc. couldn't have said it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Best example of feigning ignorance on this forum:) The mess is largely created by the outside powers in almost all of the conflict zones where people flee from. Generally in every conflict Europe and USA have a direct or indirect hand in. The French in parts of Africa, the Americans and the British in Afghanistan and Iraq etc. In virtually every instance where the US, British, Europeans, etc, have had a hand in in the last few decades has been to protect innocents from being massacred in civil unrest due to warlords, gangs and religious disruption. Why do people always lay all the blame on the West? Look what happened when they didn't help in Zimbabwe. Racist murdering, plundering, mass murder of those who disagreed, extreme inflation, no food, no medicine, etc... The West may not get it perfectly right but they do a better job than to leave these war torn 3rd world countries to their own devices. They also adhere to UN sanctions and human rights (yes there may be a few issues, but nothing like from the other sides!) Just remember the West actually comprises of multicultural equals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.