NoPests Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I eat pigs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Change and universal are not the same things. VAT is a universal tax but it changes. You still don't get it, do you. If there are discrepancies between the various cults of christianity as to "loving their neighbour" then how can it be universal. You just want everyone to be the same as you. Never gonna happen (thankfully). I think the goat's are crossing your bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Now, about that apology you owe me? You won't get one. You're dealing with a christian jihadist who expects everyone to be a clone of himself with any dissent punished (what a wonderful example of the tolerance of religion) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I eat pigs Nowt wrong with that, they taste nice:D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 You still don't get it, do you. If there are discrepancies between the various cults of christianity as to "loving their neighbour" then how can it be universal. You just want everyone to be the same as you. Never gonna happen (thankfully). I think the goat's are crossing your bridge. Christianity is what Jesus taught. One man, one message. There cannot be discrepancies when there is only one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Makes no difference, the VAT is still there, it has to be for goods to be exempted from it. It is the goods that are exempted from the VAT but the VAT still exists even though some goods are exempted. No apology necessary. Why not? You are happy to incorrectly characterise someone and call them violent yet you feel no apology is necessary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Why not? You are happy to incorrectly characterise someone and call them violent yet you feel no apology is necessary? You have no solution other than violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 There cannot be discrepancies when there is only one. So you're now saying that all christians share the same views as Westboro Baptist Church? Or what about Violence and harassment at U.S. abortion clinics? Or the RC priests who abuse children (and their bosses who cover it up)? All show how differing cults of christianity interpret the "law of love". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 You have no solution other than violence. The Brazen Rule is what most countries currently use (rewarding good, punishing bad). Seems to work for most of the world from where I'm sitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 You have no solution other than violence. OK this has gone on long enough. Can one of the moderators perhaps have a word with thie gentleman before he gets into real trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.