Jump to content

BBC Biased, Goverment Paid Propaganda !


Recommended Posts

''like a black hobnail boot forever stomping on the face of society''

 

Anthony J Hilder, referring to the BBC in his masterpiece documentary, 911 The Greatest Lie Ever Sold.

 

An interesting point if this "Anthony J Hilder" was a man of sound mind, however a quick google search reveals him to be a drooling lunatic conspiracy theorist who rather tediously blames everything bad on the "illuminati".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think the BBC calls anyone a dictator.

 

Al Jazeera refers to Mubarak as President - is that propaganda?

 

http://english.aljazeera.net/

 

LANGCOL : througout world history we can see that rich and powerful men will always use their wealth and influence *for their own benefit.*

*

Intodays world these people and groups always own media empires , it is only logical that today's media will always be used to further some ones agenda be it a single person who more than often a group, *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good V but how is that an example of BBC bias?

 

Not an example of the BBC but don't you think things are likely the same over here ?

We already know the 'broadcasting act' allows the government to take over the BBC and make them report anything THEY like- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY2NXPl625A (stated on 1.50)

and i imagine any channel governed by the broadcasting act.

The main Channels/Media give an illusion of independance and freethinking but all have the same main agenda(a common purpose)

I wouldn't trust RT to report honestly about Russia (Russia sharing the common purpose with" the west") but they will investigate and report the truth about what is going on in in Afghanistan and Iraq etc.

 

Look for something hard enough and you'll find it! :loopy:

 

No you won't.

Not if it's not there.:loopy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already know the 'broadcasting act' allows the government to take over the BBC and make them report anything THEY like

 

 

In the situation of a national emergency (eg the "four minute warning") they would have yes - the powers are in a chapter entitled "Defence and Emergency".

 

Makes sense.

 

We'd soon know if it had in any other situation as most of the staff would be telling everybody in the wide world about it - they aren't the automatons you seem to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the situation of a national emergency (eg the "four minute warning") they would have yes - the powers are in a chapter entitled "Defence and Emergency".

 

Makes sense.

 

We'd soon know if it had in any other situation as most of the staff would be telling everybody in the wide world about it - they aren't the automatons you seem to think.

 

The staff at the BBC are more prone to believing "their" own propaganda, they are likely to be 'bias' and trust they have the best sources of information.

For instance,was it Phil Hatton ? that reported WTC7 coming down over 20 mins before it did ? but was totally unaware until told during an interview years later.He couldn't even remember, or know anything about it until reminded.(obviously not something spoken about within the BBC):suspect:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LANGCOL : througout world history we can see that rich and powerful men will always use their wealth and influence *for their own benefit.*

*

Intodays world these people and groups always own media empires , it is only logical that today's media will always be used to further some ones agenda be it a single person who more than often a group, *

 

If you're going to shout my name at least spell it properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.