spooky3 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Bradley Manning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Here's a transcript! http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/wikileaks-chat/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 You can rename it any way you want, in reality the documents were stolen, then passed on to a receiver. Anything else is pointless semantics, what happened isn't in dispute. Why not try him in absence if there's no dispute? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Why not try him in absence if there's no dispute? Because it's two different crimes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayfair Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 You would execute a man for leaking information? i would execute him yes for handling stolen goods and beimg a rapist if found guilty. Normal people would have handed them in as they dont belong to you but no. ...... He is an attention seeking lowlife that should have got a real job. And the other reason id execute him is for being a rapist if found guilty of rape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 i would execute him yes for handling stolen goods and beimg a rapist if found guilty. Normal people would have handed them in as they dont belong to you but no. ...... He is an attention seeking lowlife that should have got a real job. And the other reason id execute him is for being a rapist if found guilty of rape Or even execute him for not being guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Or even execute him for not being guilty. Really ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 One of the problems here is that it is the personal mixed with the political. If the authorities want him to stand trial for rape then so be it, but why the attempt to extradite him? He's published information leaked to him from America, so they have their "leak" already. I'm not too widely read on the subject, so these are genuine questions. I'm not being rhetorical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Because it's two different crimes! Why the confused look. I'm talking about the 'receiving stolen goods' or it's wider implications, not the rape. From a public opinion perspective it seems very handy for the government to have assange up on a 'receiving stolen goods' case alongside or after a rape case. The man's guilty before he gets to court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Why the confused look. I'm talking about the 'receiving stolen goods' or it's wider implications, not the rape. From a public opinion perspective it seems very handy for the government to have assange up on a 'receiving stolen goods' case alongside or after a rape case. The man's guilty before he gets to court. Go back and read again, it didn't look like you were referring to the rape, more to Manning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.