Chris_Sleeps Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 There are many heads of charities who get more than that! Charities don't take money out of my earnings though, or wage illegal wars on my behalf. There isn't a comparison to be made between being an MP and running a charity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 Oh, I see, it's nothing to do with the fact we are broke? Nope, more to do with that it fit's in conveniently with the Cons idealogy of a small state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 Charities don't take money out of my earnings though, or wage illegal wars on my behalf. There isn't a comparison to be made between being an MP and running a charity. Most of your issues seem to stem from the actions and consequences of the previous Labour Government! And, yes there is a valid comparison between our Government and a charity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 Nope, more to do with that it fit's in conveniently with the Cons idealogy of a small state. So you won't be using that old chestnut any more! Good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 Most of your issues seem to stem from the actions and consequences of the previous Labour Government! I'm not partisan. Good and bad in all things. Conservatives are not wholly evil, and Labour are not wholly good. I'd see the same problems if Blair was making a child go to a run down school while preaching about 'Big Society'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 I'm not partisan. Good and bad in all things. Conservatives are not wholly evil, and Labour are not wholly good. I'd see the same problems if Blair was making a child go to a run down school while preaching about 'Big Society'. Well you've just blamed Cameron for something Blair did? e.g. I don't believe that to be true. If we have money for bombs then we have money for books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 What are you on about? I've not said Cameron's name once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 So you won't be using that old chestnut any more! Good! What are you on about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 What are you on about? I've not said Cameron's name once. What is the thread context? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 What are you on about? Your reply, do you know what your answering? Although David Cameron denies it, the Big Society is because he wants the state to withdraw & take a back seat. ... Oh, I see, it's nothing to do with the fact we are broke? (Sarcasm!) Nope, more to do with that it fit's in conveniently with the Cons idealogy of a small state. So you won't be using that old chestnut any more! Good! Remember! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now