Magilla Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 I'm sat here chuckling, drinking my Pinot Grigio. I can have a few more bottles now I know it's not a drug. Ahhh, but if it's not a drug there's no way it can possibly get you intoxicated. Then you might not want to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Ahhh, but if it's not a drug there's no way it can possibly get you intoxicated. Then you might not want to Oh. better go to bed with a decent book then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted February 19, 2011 Author Share Posted February 19, 2011 A new survey suggests that clubbers are still taking the drug mephedrone, nearly a year after its UK ban. A poll for the dance music magazine Mixmag, seen by BBC Radio 5 Live, found one in four of those questioned had taken the drug in the last month. 33% said the ban has had no effect on their use while another 10% said they have increased the amount they take since it was made illegal in April 2010. http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/12389389 So, the ban: 1/ Seems to have driven people to use other, more dangerous drugs 2/ Does not seem to have impacted usage levels 3/ The ban has doubled the price, and because the only sources are illegal dealers, users will be offered other drugs that may be more harmful. So, what was the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discodown Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 So, what was the point?To make it look like something is being done. Actually all its done is make the whole situation worse to nobodies benefit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 A new survey suggests that clubbers are still taking the drug mephedrone, nearly a year after its UK ban. A poll for the dance music magazine Mixmag, seen by BBC Radio 5 Live, found one in four of those questioned had taken the drug in the last month. 33% said the ban has had no effect on their use while another 10% said they have increased the amount they take since it was made illegal in April 2010. http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/12389389 So, the ban: 1/ Seems to have driven people to use other, more dangerous drugs 2/ Does not seem to have impacted usage levels 3/ The ban has doubled the price, and because the only sources are illegal dealers, users will be offered other drugs that may be more harmful. So, what was the point? If you feel so strongly about this matter as it appears from your posts I suggest you bring these matters to the attention of your MP who is in a position to do something about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted February 19, 2011 Author Share Posted February 19, 2011 If you feel so strongly about this matter as it appears from your posts I suggest you bring these matters to the attention of your MP who is in a position to do something about it. Guffaw. The Government appointed experts to advise them on drugs policy. The experts explained that ecstasy is safer than alcohol. The government sacked the experts and appointed a rabidly anti-drugs psycho Christian who believed homosexuals were more likely to be paedophiles. It's naive to believe government policy on drugs isn't: 1/ Inextricably tied to America's absurd War On Drugs and 2/ Informed by tabloid rubbish and middle-England hysteria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Guffaw. The Government appointed experts to advise them on drugs policy. The experts explained that ecstasy is safer than alcohol. The government sacked the experts and appointed a rabidly anti-drugs psycho Christian who believed homosexuals were more likely to be paedophiles. It's naive to believe government policy on drugs isn't: 1/ Inextricably tied to America's absurd War On Drugs and 2/ Informed by tabloid rubbish and middle-England hysteria But otherwise you have no realistic chance of changing anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted February 19, 2011 Author Share Posted February 19, 2011 Actually though, you have a point harvey, The Green Party are the only ones talking sense: UK approach to drugs has been "an epic failure" Green MP Caroline Lucas, who spoke at a Westminster Hall debate on government drugs policy today, said: "The UK's approach to dealing with drugs, based on criminalisation rather than harm reduction, has been an epic failure. In England and Wales alone, the economic costs of Class A drugs (dealing with related crime and demands on the NHS, for example) are estimated at more than £15.4 billion per year - and over half of the 85,000 people in prison are thought to have serious drug problems. Much of our current approach is based on kneejerk moral judgements about drug use and drug users - rather than on what actually works to reduce harm. http://www.greenparty.org.uk/news/2010-12-16-decriminalisation-drug-possession.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.