radar Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 They might have been about to sack him for making up ****....and the excuses start:)...they might not have been about to be sacked for making it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 ...and the excuses start:)...they might not have been about to be sacked for making it up? Be he did make stuff up himself, he admitted that. Hacks with no integrity is as much part of the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Be he did make stuff up himself, he admitted that. Hacks with no integrity is as much part of the problem. he had a job, he had bosses, was it him that "made stuff up" or was he TOLD to make things up? theres a difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smithster Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 They might have been about to sack him for making up ****. In my humble opinion, if the daily Star had a policy of sacking journalists who wrote unfounded and outright fabricated stories, then there would no longer be a Daily Star as they would not have any journalists left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.