Jump to content

Police corruption for 24 years?


Recommended Posts

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/11/scotland-yard-daniel-morgan-killers

 

Can anyone shed some light on this? Perhaps it's me, but the article doesn't seem to spell things out in clear terms.

 

Does anyone remember this? 24 years ago, seems a hell of long time to prosecute murderers.:huh:

 

Yep. It's complete and utter corruption, and we pay the £30m to whitewash the police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The family was behind the current investigation by hand-picked Scotland Yard officers.

 

But the failure of the case, which collapsed before a jury was even sworn, throws up serious questions about the use of supergrass deals offering reductions in sentences in return for evidence, and the offer of rewards.

 

Underworld figures and their associates had volunteered to give evidence after a £50,000 reward was offered.

 

One had a lengthy prison term reduced after agreeing to be a prosecution witness.

 

And a woman, a former partner of James Cook, who was charged with murder but freed last year, was discredited after claiming that up to 30 murders had been committed. Extensive searches produced no bodies.

 

Scotland Yard was even accused of buying a house next to one of the defendants in order to plant listening bugs in the walls.

 

The halting of the case is a major embarrassment for Scotland Yard and the file will remain open until the killer is caught.

 

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/cover-up-claim-as-daniel-morgan-axe-case-folds-2239189.htmlV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has there been any talk of an official enquiry into this?

 

There have been five already. It's already well-established that police corruption at the time of the original investigation means there is no chance of securing a conviction against anybody. I'm not sure what a further enquiry could tell us that we don't already know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been five already. It's already well-established that police corruption at the time of the original investigation means there is no chance of securing a conviction against anybody. I'm not sure what a further enquiry could tell us that we don't already know.

 

I think the enquiry could unturn a few stones as this report from today's Guardian and Independent has done. It gets murkier & murkier:

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/11/phone-hacking-dark-arts-jonathan-rees

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/murdoch-ally-warned-mp-not-to-pursue-hacking-scandal-2238673.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.