melthebell Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 No It Isn't Read the documentation. There is NO SUCH requirement. so the whole worlds press is wrong and your right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 And I'm saying you are totally wrong. Nothing is safe - if you are going to generate and control large amounts of power then you are going to have some risk. Compared to other forms of generation, nuclear is safe. indeed nothings safe, what ive been arguing tho is if it does go wrong boy does it go wrong, as we're seeing in japan, far wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 so the whole worlds press is wrong and your right Have you read the documentation? Would you like a link to it to check? If they are saying a classification of level 5 requires deaths then they are wrong. Three Mile Island was classifed as level 5 - you can go check that - there were no deaths from it - you can check that - ergo the classification is wrong on that basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 indeed nothings safe, what ive been arguing tho is if it does go wrong boy does it go wrong, as we're seeing in japan, far wrong You have been spectacularly unsuccessful in your arguments so far then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 I'd agree that nuclear power is relatively safe. But why is it so safe? Because it's inherently very hazardous. It's safety comes from all the safety measures put in place. So, take away all the safety measures from power generation methods - and then compare them: Nuclear fission comes out pretty poorly. It is safe because of the measures put in place to make it so. You are relying on the efficacy of those measures to ensure safety. TEPCO's track record shouldn't be filling people with confidence about those safety measures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 You have been spectacularly unsuccessful in your arguments so far then. not really, ive proved your a none reading idiot........whos selectively ignored the recent posts to point it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 The only person ignoring stuff at the moment is you. Have you read that document - would you like a link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 I'd agree that nuclear power is relatively safe. But why is it so safe? Because it's inherently very hazardous. It's safety comes from all the safety measures put in place. So, take away all the safety measures from power generation methods - and then compare them: Nuclear fission comes out pretty poorly. It is safe because of the measures put in place to make it so. You are relying on the efficacy of those measures to ensure safety. TEPCO's track record shouldn't be filling people with confidence about those safety measures. indeed its safe because it NEEDS to be, weve made sure it is.........but this natural disaster has shown it aint that safe in the big scheme of things and we need to work harder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 The only person ignoring stuff at the moment is you. Have you read that document - would you like a link? if you must, have all the worlds media missed this link? im sure they mustve seen it when researching their articles?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/INES-2009_web.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.