Grahame Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Most don't care. What most people care about is the thread title, which is about someone using religion as an excuse for a homophobic attack. He wasn't following Christianity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Vader Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Most don't care. What most people care about is the thread title, which is about someone using religion as an excuse for a homophobic attack. And here is the proverbial NAIL. Westboro Church - Gay haters, Al Qaaeda, and formerly Catholic and Protestant terrorist groups in Northern Ireland - for starters, but the list is endless.....They are people who act out of fear, which is the enemy of love, and therefore the enemy of any religion (requesting they love and respect their neighbour, and don't kill) they profess to represent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denlin Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 You are making too many assumptions and your imagination is working overtime. This is what you do with Christianity. Read the OP it doesn't take much imagination when he is sole executor of victims estate. It's you who has an overactive imagination in thinking the bible is not fiction. Read your previous posts when you said you leave out the bad bits when writing your family history thus making it an untrue history just the same as the new and old testament are- not real:roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denlin Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 He wasn't following Christianity. He was following the bible, whats the difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 If he was following the Bible why didn't he stone his victim instead of hitting him over the head with a cosh. if he was following the bible, how come he coshed the guy, and didn't show compassion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercenary Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 He wasn't following Christianity. Well thank you for proving my point, each persons interpretation is different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 if he was following the bible, how come he coshed the guy, and didn't show compassion? Cos he wasn't following Jesus was he. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 He wasn't following Christianity. The idiot in question states he is one, therefore, he is one (regardless of what ever you may think). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Cos he wasn't following Jesus was he. "Jesus" != bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 The idiot in question states he is one, therefore, he is one (regardless of what ever you may think). And I'm a singer/song-writer "therefore, I am one (regardless of what ever you may think)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.