Tony Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 thousands of sightings over centuries by people can not be so easily dismissed,they arnt all inventing stories for attention surely,some have been reported by people of good standing such as police officers etc.many of the sightings have passed into folk law such as anne bolyne in the tower of london ,seen by umpteen witnesses over the centuries Who says that it's Anne Boleyn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alrockman Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Human imagination is capable of creating anything to explain the unexplained. Our imagination can create Gods to explain the universe and we can create ghosts to explain why a vase fell of a shelf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Who says that it's Anne Boleyn? probably came from sightings years ago by people who actually knew her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Wouldn't that fall into the same category as the talking burning bush? Or unicorns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Would have thought being a Police officer is not the best evidence of the existence of bogey men.usually their evidence holds up in courts throuout the land,are you saying they arnt fit to give evidence as trained observers ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Wouldn't that fall into the same category as the talking burning bush? Or unicorns? the burning bush actually exists ,its a genus of plant that spreads its seed by self combustion or so ive read at some point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 usually their evidence holds up in courts throuout the land,are you saying they arnt fit to give evidence as trained observers ? Not when their evidence includes supernatural mumbo jumbo, no. When did a murderer get life based on a policeman using mumbo jumbo as evidence? Why would I accept the evidence of a policeman, nurse or doctor when as human beings they are just as fallible as the next human being. For every copper admitting to seeing a ghost there'll be 20 coppers who are bent as a nine bob note, so not a good example eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Which bush genus does the talking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Not when their evidence includes supernatural mumbo jumbo, no. When did a murderer get life based on a policeman using mumbo jumbo as evidence? Why would I accept the evidence of a policeman, nurse or doctor when as human beings they are just as fallible as the next human being. For every copper admitting to seeing a ghost there'll be 20 coppers who are bent as a nine bob note, so not a good example eh. a hundred years ago people would have denied the existance of dna as evidence ,we cant see it but know its there ,just the same as we cant see the wind ,but it exists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Darwin convinced Victorians that man came from apes not clay. Why would DNA be denied a hundred years ago if it was there to see? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.