mattleonard Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 im not a troll, i posted a link to back up my statement, its just that some people on here feel very strongly that they have the right to cycle where they want with no helmet and little regard to safety, thats the reason for a private members bill. So please feel free to explain to us all how that is trolling? How is not wearing a helmet going to result in a charge of death by dangerous cycling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawny1970 Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 How is not wearing a helmet going to result in a charge of death by dangerous cycling? laws of physics if someone travelling at 20-30mph hits a stationary person will do a lot of damage and potentially kill someone, including the cyclist, thats why a helmet is preferable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 In the case of £0 per annum it is.can you please explain why you think raod tax is solely based on emissions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 A good point, what do you think vehicle excise duty is about then (its not called road tax any more, not for over 70 years)?So you along with 'Eater Sundae' think road tax is based solely on emissions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I wish your posts were taxed on emissions. Because if the emissions of methane (the gas emitted when bulls go to the toilet) were totted up, you'd be bankrupt.So you think road tax is based solely on emission as well do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 That is because Bassman62 and Dawny1970 are trolls. Classic trolls, if not very sophisticated ones. Just stop feeding them. Resist the urge to hit "Reply" and kill the thread stone dead. The posts on this page like the one quoted in the above reply are of the usual type to get the thread closed because having lost the argument regarding the topic certain members have to fall back on making offensive and insulting posts in doing so they start arguments and get the thread closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I believe that the term is transexual. This thread is about:- Dangerous cyclists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 You do know dawny is a bloke, don't you?This thread is about:- Dangerous cyclists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsMozzy Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 This thread is about:- Dangerous cyclists I was replying to his referral to dawny as "dear" and actually when I realised he (dawny) was male it made me read his comments differently. So I personally don't feel it was totally off- topic. I could argue that your constant referral to sports cars is not directly related to " dangerous cyclists" either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I was replying to his referral to you as "dear" and actually when I realised you were male it made me read your comments differently. So I personally don't feel it was totally off- topic.. Don't worry about it, Bassman62's quite happy to go off topic when he feels the urge to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.