mj.scuba Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Typical of Cameron to take something for free when he can afford to pay for it. Like taking his one hundred and forty thousand pounds a year salary paid for by the tax payer when he is already a multi millionnaire. Are you suggesting he should work for free? Would you do your job for free, just because you have more relative wealth than somebody less fortunate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJC1 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 And who deregulated the banks in the first place, wasn it The Snatcher in 1980 per chance? It was indeed, the last Labour government did nothing either... but three wrongs dont make a right, its never too late to make changes, although cutting bonuses is just a token gesture. There must be bigger changes than that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 But who caused the 'mess' Wasn't it the bankers? Just Google "Labour Spending" and you'll see who caused the mess - Labour in a desperate attempt to buy your votes by promising lots of shiny new things. Did you not stop to think where the money would come from and whether the best value solution was bought? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJC1 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Labour spunked a load of money up the well, but it was all facilitated by the banks when lending spiralled out of control...still cutting like mad and killing the economy is not the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Just Google "Labour Spending" and you'll see who caused the mess - Labour in a desperate attempt to buy your votes by promising lots of shiny new things. Did you not stop to think where the money would come from and whether the best value solution was bought? Such as? You haven't provided any evidence. Everyone knows Labour have to spend heavily after the Tories because money makes the world go round; tories just run the entire economy into the ground time after time by making stupid cuts that only hurt the economy and the public. Like I mentioned earlier, people have said governments don't make a profit, therefore the make a loss and since we always make a loss the money will be never paid back so there's no point in arguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Typical of Cameron to take something for free when he can afford to pay for it. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. That you've given up on any legitimate reason for your viewpoint pertty much sums up how worthless it is. Like taking his one hundred and forty thousand pounds a year salary paid for by the tax payer when he is already a multi millionnaire. Twice in one post, well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Such as? You haven't provided any evidence. Shall we start with BSF? There are loads of posts from me with firm proof, facts and figures if you search. Then shall we look at the spiralling cost of the ID cards? Then how about a look at Labour paying for upgrading things which were privately owned - like £39 million to refurbish Blackpool Tower? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Rich Posted May 4, 2011 Author Share Posted May 4, 2011 Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. That you've given up on any legitimate reason for your viewpoint pertty much sums up how worthless it is. Twice in one post, well done! I love insults, it proves you have lost the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 I love insults, it proves you have lost the argument. What argument? You haven't got one that's based on anything other than your own misguided and incorrect "truths". How can saying that a viewpoint based on falsehoods and gross generalisations is worthless be an insult? Rather than feigned indigance where none is warranted, why not say why you think your viewpoint isn't worthless, without having to resort to gross generalisations that aren't actually true? If you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Yet for all the hot air coming out of the labour supporters, we're still waiting for Red Ed to tell us what he'd do to cut the deficit. Is he waiting for Bob Crow and his union paymasters to tell him what his policies will be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.