Bassman62 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Why? After several lies they admitted killing an unarmed man in front of a child after shooting her mum in the leg. If a cop in the US did that, even if the suspect was a mass murderer, he would be up in court. :roll::roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 So killing an unarmed man is OK if he's a killer? :roll::roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Prime Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 No unarmed at home with the wife and kids it seems. It was not known he was unarmed until after the event. Unless he was naked and not in reach of a weapon it had to be assumed he was armed. Any suffering of the children is the fault of the father. Interesting how you believe without question those sections of the US governments report that makes them look bad while simultaneously refusing to believe those sections that make them look good or even to believe OBL is dead at all. On a separate note I'd be interested to know which conspiracy theories you believe and which ones you don't e.g. do you believe moon landings fake? CIA killed Kennedy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 That may be true but there would be an enquiry if it was a police killing. Why not here instead of hailing the soldiers as heroes? Boring Boring Boring Boring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meyouus Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 I get it. being near a man who's on a kill list entitles his killers to shoot you in front of your 12 year old daughter. Is that correct? yes................................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 It was not known he was unarmed until after the event. Unless he was naked and not in reach of a weapon it had to be assumed he was armed. Any suffering of the children is the fault of the father. Interesting how you believe without question those sections of the US governments report that makes them look bad while simultaneously refusing to believe those sections that make them look good or even to believe OBL is dead at all. On a separate note I'd be interested to know which conspiracy theories you believe and which ones you don't e.g. do you believe moon landings fake? CIA killed Kennedy? Don't give the guy time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 On a separate note I'd be interested to know which conspiracy theories you believe and which ones you don't e.g. do you believe moon landings fake? CIA killed Kennedy? The Earth is flat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Prime Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 I get it. being near a man who's on a kill list entitles his killers to shoot you in front of your 12 year old daughter. Is that correct? Yes. Or are we to assume Bin Laden's ladies are soft little flowers? You know when it comes to middle eastern politics a lot of anti terrorist groups specifically shoot the women first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 The Earth is flat? I wish some of these conspiricy freaks would fall over the edge.:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 I never said it was correct But she was obviously willing to take that risk, knowing he was a wanted man, was she expecting those who eventually did track him down to turn up with just a pair of hand cuffs? What the hell? She's 12 years old, she doesn't have much of a choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.