Streamline Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 I'm failing to see the picture Actually. Are you saying these animals are doing it to satisfy their sadistic urges? Urges that(as far as I am aware)only humans are consciously aware of? Viewed through a human lense, ducks indulge in gang rape, bonobo monkeys commit incest and acts of homsexuality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Viewed through a human lense, ducks indulge in gang rape, bonobo monkeys commit incest and acts of homsexuality.Are they aware that their infringement on duck and monkey rights is wrong though? You're funny. You really are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Are they aware that their infringement on duck and monkey rights is wrong though? You're funny. You really are. Not as funny are Halibut the mangina surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Not as funny are Halibut the mangina surely? Halibut's lends insincere sentiment to most sensitive issues. But in his defence, he's not the only SF user guilty of doing it. Blowing smoke up peoples asses is a common trait on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Halibut's lends insincere sentiment to most sensitive issues. But in his defence, he's not the only SF user guilty of doing it. Blowing smoke up peoples asses is a common trait on here. Seems to me in my usual endeavours the smoke blowers are leaving. Either they're starting to grow up or the public service cutbacks means they don't get paid for posting in here anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Seems to me in my usual endeavours the smoke blowers are leaving. Either they're starting to grow up or the public service cutbacks means they don't get paid for posting in here anymore. I envisage the mangina's taking to the streets in masses in protest wearing Bruno style cut downs that expose the bum cheeks:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riche Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 People do read the book by its cover. If I dressed Like a Skin head you might be excused for thinking I'm a racist thug and deserve to get slotted on a night out, Well dress like a whore and you might get your bum pintched or worse. Not right but many people can't read very well so expect people to read you wrong. Cover up and show some class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 People do read the book by its cover. If I dressed Like a Skin head you might be excused for thinking I'm a racist thug and deserve to get slotted on a night out, Well dress like a whore and you might get your bum pintched or worse. Not right but many people can't read very well so expect people to read you wrong. Cover up and show some class.I agree with you Riche. However, I feel it necessary to point out to you that some SF members would consider it politically incorrect to draw comparisons between 'dressing like a skin head' and 'dressing like a whore'. Don't ask me why though. No go on, ask me why!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 I envisage the mangina's taking to the streets in masses in protest wearing Bruno style cut downs that expose the bum cheeks:hihi: Indeed and then walk into a gay bar and complain about getting sexually assaulted or walking into a straight bar and getting lumped in the face. Come the resulting court case guess who it is doesn't want the jury to take account of their behaviour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Indeed and then walk into a gay bar and complain about getting sexually assaulted or walking into a straight bar and getting lumped in the face. Come the resulting court case guess who it is doesn't want the jury to take account of their behaviour? Aarrh, but the jury would know before hand that they are required to reach a verdict based on idealism, not reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.