manofstrad Posted May 8, 2011 Author Share Posted May 8, 2011 And you are? No, I am not just a writer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medusa Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Yes, of course there are some men on the list that were left money by rich relatives. None of them married for money though, do you see the difference? You have proof that all of the women married just to get rich then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 No, I am not just a writer. Not as wealthy or successful as JK Rowling then ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manofstrad Posted May 8, 2011 Author Share Posted May 8, 2011 You have proof that all of the women married just to get rich then? I don't need feel the need to prove it, Do you have proof that they didn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manofstrad Posted May 8, 2011 Author Share Posted May 8, 2011 Not as wealthy or successful as JK Rowling then ! I'm not sure what you are getting at. I am asking whether it is moraly right to include gold digging females in the rich list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medusa Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 I don't need feel the need to prove it, Do you have proof that they didn't? I'm not claiming that none of them did, yet you are claiming that they should be treated differently to men, most of whom have inherited money too. I'd like you to justify that, rather than trying to turn the argument round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampent Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 If I ended up on the rich list, I would just drink myself to death, and smash numerous high end cars up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 I'm not sure what you are getting at. I am asking whether it is moraly right to include gold digging females in the rich list? Yes because it is not a moral rich list, it is a rich list, nothing else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manofstrad Posted May 8, 2011 Author Share Posted May 8, 2011 I'm not claiming that none of them did, yet you are claiming that they should be treated differently to men, most of whom have inherited money too. I'd like you to justify that, rather than trying to turn the argument round. It is not an arguement. Do you think it is right that women who get wealthy through a series of high profile divorces should have their actions glorified by being included on the rich list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manofstrad Posted May 8, 2011 Author Share Posted May 8, 2011 Yes because it is not a moral rich list, it is a rich list, nothing else. Fair point. Do you think we should have a 'Moral rich list'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.