Longcol Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Miriam Hyman was reported by more than one source to have telephoned her father at 9:45 from Kings Cross. After this time she also phoned her office and was told not to come in. Her father confirmed this and originally expressed doubt as to how she could have been on the No 30 bus that exploded in Tavistock Square 2 minutes later at 9:47. That's how the story came about. The story of some shootings at Canary Wharf on the morning of July 7 2005 is not widely known as for some reason, the story was buried and not discussed in the msm beyond the initial reports. So from this scant "evidence" Hill concluded that she'd been shot at Canary Wharf by secret services and saw fit to write to her father with his fantasies? What sort of person does that sort of thing? Not somebody after truth or justice that's for certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quisquose Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 I've heard so many heart-wrenching stories from survivors, witnesses and families of victims, that I can't comprehend why people want to want to rub salt in the wounds and call them all liars. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9477887.stm What sort of sick individuals want to seek some sort of childish self-gratification over the almost pornographic abuse of the lives of these people? Go back and have your bit of fun with the moon landing conspiracies, at least that was only an insult to the achievements of many people, but this ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arctic Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Is this the guy that was in Stargate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastbank Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 So from this scant "evidence" Hill concluded that she'd been shot at Canary Wharf by secret services and saw fit to write to her father with his fantasies? What sort of person does that sort of thing? Not somebody after truth or justice that's for certain. fruitcake springs to mind....should have got exported to syria....he would have loved it there.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shring Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 So from this scant "evidence" Hill concluded that she'd been shot at Canary Wharf by secret services and saw fit to write to her father with his fantasies? What sort of person does that sort of thing? Not somebody after truth or justice that's for certain. Good question. It's a very sensitive area contacting families of bereaved. If Hill wrote this letter to Mr Hyman and if Hill wrote was he is said to have done then he gets no applause from me. I think it's unfortunate that, every time people have serious questions to ask of the state, a loon appears from nowhere and dominates the entire stage. The noise from the lunatics seems to be the only characterisation of the entire genre that is promoted to a wider audience by the msm, Sheffield Star (Johnston Press) included. Regarding the timing of Miriam Hyman's calls and whereabouts that morning. As far as I understand, it was Mr Hyman who gave the original story about Miriam's call to him from Kings Cross at 9:45. He stood by those facts when subsequently asked about them and confirmed that he had doubts about Miriam being able to be on the No 30 bus that exploded in Tavistock Square, only 2 minutes later at 9.47. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 So you know the answer to your own question. Where did you hear that then ? I don't actually - I was looking for info on how the trial had gone and couldn't find anything apart from a post on some random site saying some judge (pre-trial) had stopped him from calling the Queen as a witness and that that was evidence of how corrupt the whole organisation was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 As far as I understand, it was Mr Hyman who gave the original story about Miriam's call to him from Kings Cross at 9:45. He stood by those facts when subsequently asked about them and confirmed that he had doubts about Miriam being able to be on the No 30 bus that exploded in Tavistock Square, only 2 minutes later at 9.47. These sorts of things are very easy to answer for anyone who needs to know. The mobile phone network records the times of every call, and the cell it is made/received from. With regards to the timings, it's not hard to see that Mr Hyman's words could have been "she called at about quarter to ten", which gives a much wider timescale for the call to have been receieved. It's also possible that whichever clock Mr Hyman looked at was wrong. Without the timings from the phone companies it is impossible to draw any firm conclusions based solely on what the press have reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 Good question. It's a very sensitive area contacting families of bereaved. If Hill wrote this letter to Mr Hyman and if Hill wrote was he is said to have done then he gets no applause from me. I think it's unfortunate that, every time people have serious questions to ask of the state, a loon appears from nowhere and dominates the entire stage. Well this thread is about a loon who came from nowhere to dominate the entire stage. Shall we keep to the topic and not try to re-run the 7/7 debate over again which we've had on here ad-nauseum (and has been closed). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted May 13, 2011 Author Share Posted May 13, 2011 I've heard so many heart-wrenching stories from survivors, witnesses and families of victims, that I can't comprehend why people want to want to rub salt in the wounds and call them all liars. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9477887.stm What sort of sick individuals want to seek some sort of childish self-gratification over the almost pornographic abuse of the lives of these people? Go back and have your bit of fun with the moon landing conspiracies, at least that was only an insult to the achievements of many people, but this ... I am not calling them liars the families have been lied to like the rest of us. Let's remember anyway Hill was not standing accused of sending the DVD to families and no complaint had been made about it and I don't think mentioned in court. The media started with that in the article to blacken his name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quisquose Posted May 13, 2011 Share Posted May 13, 2011 I am not calling them liars the families have been lied to like the rest of us. If you agree with the claims that you set out in your OP, then yes you are. Sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.