Bassman62 Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 OK We give money to educate poor Pakistanis. We help to EDUCATE them We help them to READ and WRITE and LEARN The alternative is....we don't help them, they don't learn, they go to the only schools that will have them, The local Madrasah where they will not learn how to read and write but will learn how to repeat passages from the Koran in Arabiq. Then they might learn to hate Western civilisation and democracy...they may go to Afghanistan and become Taliban. They may end up killing British soldiers or civilians...... Do you see? Which scenario do you prefer? head...wall ...bang What sentimental rubbish, Pakistan has been independent for over 60 years and what have they achieved: virtualy zero? Oh foregot they're a nuclear power. The people are poor yet you ask us to pay for education which indirectly funds their nuclear arms programme. Corruption is rife, Taliban terrorist training camps left right and centre, sharia law overules civil law. We've given £650million to a country full of muslim terrorists including 'Bin Liner'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 Are they funded from overseas aid? They could be funded from the surplus provided if overseas aid was stopped or are you telling me that you agree with giving pakistan £650million when most of the muslim terrorists are trained there including curent main bases for the Taliban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 Why are we allowing £20bn per year of tax evasion? We shouldn't be but have you asked your MP about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 What sentimental rubbish, Pakistan has been independent for over 60 years and what have they achieved: virtualy zero? Oh foregot they're a nuclear power. The people are poor yet you ask us to pay for education which indirectly funds their nuclear arms programme. Corruption is rife, Taliban terrorist training camps left right and centre, sharia law overules civil law. We've given £650million to a country full of muslim terrorists including 'Bin Liner'. Fling as many soundbites as you can, maybe one might stick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 Fling as many soundbites as you can, maybe one might stick Well I've noticed you as per usual can't dispute what I've posted only that you can't take the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 OK We give money to educate poor Pakistanis. We help to EDUCATE them We help them to READ and WRITE and LEARN The alternative is....we don't help them, they don't learn, they go to the only schools that will have them, The local Madrasah where they will not learn how to read and write but will learn how to repeat passages from the Koran in Arabiq. Then they might learn to hate Western civilisation and democracy...they may go to Afghanistan and become Taliban. They may end up killing British soldiers or civilians...... Do you see? Which scenario do you prefer? head...wall ...bang So what you are saying is that Pakistanis send their children to hate school and they hate us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 the only interest in the middle east and pakistan and india is oil And without that oil you'd be riding to work on a donkey. We should be exploring alternatives to oil. The money saved from cutting foreign aid could fund research Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fareast Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 I 'm all for this Overseas Aid and I think these foreigners should start sending a lot more of it to the U.K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 And without that oil you'd be riding to work on a donkey. We should be exploring alternatives to oil. The money saved from cutting foreign aid could fund research Yeah, but it'd make a lot more sense to fund it through the stupendously huge profits made by selling fossils. It's not either/or - we can easily afford to do both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 Well I've noticed you as per usual can't dispute what I've posted only that you can't take the truth. just because YOU spout it incessantly DOESNT make it true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.