boyfriday Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 First time David Norris is being tried for this offence. Longcol, the chinese water torture approach doesn't work with Streamline, you need a sledgehammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 which is all good and well i believe its right individuals should have rights in such matters. BUT 1: i still say youd be the first out with the pitchfork if it happens in other certain cases which DONT fit in with your narrow views. I'll just answer this but i am starting to get annoyed with you now, READ BACK THROUGH THE THREAD and you can clearly see Britpat made the same comment regarding a Muslim defendant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 Longcol, the chinese water torture approach doesn't work with Streamline, you need a sledgehammer Like arguing with the "truthers". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 Longcol, the chinese water torture approach doesn't work with Streamline, you need a sledgehammer 6 pages in and not one of em has actually mentioned the trial for the other one lol selective reading / hearing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 Didn't Griffin at some point try to smear Lawrence as a drug dealer and claim it was a black on black murder? Did he? How would he know, the police haven't even managed to solve it getting on for 2 decades later, this is where we came in ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 6 pages in and not one of em has actually mentioned the trial for the other one lol selective reading / hearing To be fair, Britpat grudgingly acknowledged it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 I'll just answer this but i am starting to get annoyed with you now, READ BACK THROUGH THE THREAD and you can clearly see Britpat made the same comment regarding a Muslim defendant. i saw, but i dont actually think he means it, i really believe its a selective view. its funny how the right wingers bang on about free speech and now rights for individuals WHEN IT SUITS THEIR VIEWPOINT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 Like arguing with the "truthers". Indeed, I think it was aliens what did it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 I'll just answer this but i am starting to get annoyed with you now lets be fair it doesnt take much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 6 pages in and not one of em has actually mentioned the trial for the other one lol selective reading / hearing You really should learn to read ( spelling and thinking could go on your todo list as well) I have already disagreed with 'Muslim extremists' being tried twice ! I have already stated that providing a prima facie case exists I can't see why the 'other one' shouldn't be tried. Go back to sleep now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.