btweentlines Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Assistant Commisioner Cressida Dick is on a direct route to make amends for her almighty Jean Charles de Menezes **** up. Since then she has enjoyed a meteoric rise in the ranks of the Met, and has shown hunger in a stealth like mode in managing the Specialist Crime Directorate as well as delivering forensics, intelligence and covert policing capability to the whole of the Met. The forensic evidence has been carried out by an overseas forensics source based in USA. All UK companies declined to become actively involved in the forensics required by Cressida Dicks Department, the responsibility and pressure for the findings to be the right one has meant the out sourcing of this responsibility. No UK forensic institution would touch this task. Cressida Dick's department has also regularly approached family members of the accused with offers of money and homes to try and pressurise defendants into testifying against each other Even the Governor of HMP of the particular prison where the defendants are held is required to tow the line. Both defendants are innocent until proven guilty. No evidence is available to prove who murdered Lawrence. The defendants live under the radar and not like some quotes on here "Well considering this mob have told half of Bromley they did it though often not in so many words I would be suprised if alongside the forensic evidence they have a whole glut of people willing to testify to things they've said that would indicate their guilt too. I would be amazed if they were innocent. They've spent the last 18 years swaggering around like their big men and the whole association makes them look hard and thinking they were untouchable. The vast majority of people around their area hate them and would be glad to see them chucked in jail. I grew up there, all my family are there, I know. They will be no great loss to society if they're banged up" The case is purely a political one. Stephen Lawrence is not the only unsolved case in UK's history, what happens with all the other cases? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlight59 Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Its about time this was put to bed how many yrs has this dragged on for and still no nearer to the conviction the liberals want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John X Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 and still no nearer to the conviction the liberals want. So it's only liberals who are interested in justice? An interesting theory. John X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Its about time this was put to bed how many yrs has this dragged on for and still no nearer to the conviction the liberals want. It's not just liberals that want these scumbags convicted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Do you understand the jury system in the UK? John X A jury is usually picked from the locality of the court where the trial will be held which in turn is usually the nearest to where the accused hail from so in this case ,if the jury is made up of all white or majority white jurors I would imagine the accused ,being black would have little chance of aquittal if the evidence is presented correctly,indeed if feelings are that high in the local black community the same result would seem to be the case...they would have to move the trial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John X Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 if the jury is made up of all white or majority white jurors I would imagine the accused ,being black would have little chance of aquittal if the evidence is presented correctly,indeed if feelings are that high in the local black community the same result would seem to be the case... I think you've been spending too much time on St******nt This the UK, not Alabama! John X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Its about time this was put to bed how many yrs has this dragged on for and still no nearer to the conviction the liberals want. I'm guessing if your son/daughter had been racially abused and stabbed to death on a public street by a group of Muslim youths, for absolutely no reason-you'd also want a conviction..since it would be very difficult for someone to murder themselves under these same circumstances don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 if the jury is made up of all white or majority white jurors I would imagine the accused ,being black would have little chance of aquittal if the evidence is presented correctly Are you suggesting the criminal justice system is skewed against blacks because the majority of the population being white would convict minority black defendants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Are you suggesting the criminal justice system is skewed against blacks because the majority of the population being white would convict minority black defendants? In certain circumstances..yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I think you've been spending too much time on St******nt This the UK, not Alabama! John X Your post is very contradictory to itself read it back to yourself and see if you can spot your glaring mistake. So what your saying is that a black youth from the ghettoes who robs a middle/upper class white residence has the same chance in court as a white youth from a higher background....cloud cuckoo land on your part Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.