TheTwirler Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13477811 So it seems that the Footballer at the centre of a "Super-injunction" is now attempting to get Twitter to release details of people who have allegedly named him and broke said court order. Maybe if he'd kept it in his pants it wouldn't be such an issue. Anyway, surely as this has been printed in foreign media, why is this not now allowed to be public knowledge? Where will it end? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gormenghast Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13477811 So it seems that the Footballer at the centre of a "Super-injunction" is now attempting to get Twitter to release details of people who have allegedly named him and broke said court order. Maybe if he'd kept it in his pants it wouldn't be such an issue. Anyway, surely as this has been printed in foreign media, why is this not now allowed to be public knowledge? Where will it end? Maybe a warning for people that post on here that they're not immune from having to justify their posts? Glad I'm not a mod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twiglet Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 I've just deleted a post where someone pushed the boundaries beyond acceptable limits in the context of this discussion. I'm afraid that as we can't trust people not to start dropping clear hints to the identity of the person involved, the thread is now closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.