Chris_Sleeps Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Citizens Advice - How to dispute a debt. Get in touch with these people if you feel you have need of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobsdadsbro Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 it used to be seven years but now 6 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V.Rossi Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Unsecured: 6 yrs Secured: (I think) 24yrs. A phone bill is unsecured so six. Just ignore them though, debt collectors have no rights of access unless you firstly invite them in, after which they can gain access in whatever which way they want. The only debt collectors that legally have the right to smash your door in etc are those sent by HMRC or the magistrates court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Just ignore them though, debt collectors have no rights of access unless you firstly invite them in, after which they can gain access in whatever which way they want. That's true of properly appointed bailiffs but it is not true of debt collectors. And it's only true of bailiffs if there has been a CCJ and you've not adhered to it. Large people called Vinny turning up and claiming to be bailiffs when there has been no CCJ are almost certainly breaking the law; if they force entry, they are definitely certainly breaking the law, whether they've previously been into the property or not. 2006 is less than six years ago, so I'm not sure whether the best policy is "total ignoral" or a letter explaining that you do not owe any money, never did, and will treat any further letters as a harassment case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 That's true of properly appointed bailiffs but it is not true of debt collectors. And it's only true of bailiffs if there has been a CCJ and you've not adhered to it. Large people called Vinny turning up and claiming to be bailiffs when there has been no CCJ are almost certainly breaking the law; if they force entry, they are definitely certainly breaking the law, whether they've previously been into the property or not. 2006 is less than six years ago, so I'm not sure whether the best policy is "total ignoral" or a letter explaining that you do not owe any money, never did, and will treat any further letters as a harassment case. Stand to be corrected but the 6yrs are from the point of no contact between both parties. Making contact will just reinvent the 6yrs. It sounds to me like a 3rd party has purchased a long outstanding debt, probably for pennies. If I was the OP I would return the next unopened letter with 'No longer at this address', or just ignore. If any of them had any clout they would have made their move well before now. Edit: Auto beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Stand to be corrected but the 6yrs are from the point of no contact between both parties. Making contact will just reinvent the 6yrs. Auto98uk has made the same point, and in light of that I'm inclined to say that "total ignoral" is indeed the best policy. (I wouldn't risk returning it to sender, because that might end up being counted as contact if they can persuade a judge that you're the one who returned it...) It may not work, because a phone company, of all people, is likely to give you a call and check who you are before telling you they want their money back. That would count as a contact if you've confirmed your identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Auto98uk has made the same point, and in light of that I'm inclined to say that "total ignoral" is indeed the best policy. (I wouldn't risk returning it to sender, because that might end up being counted as contact if they can persuade a judge that you're the one who returned it...) It may not work, because a phone company, of all people, is likely to give you a call and check who you are before telling you they want their money back. That would count as a contact if you've confirmed your identity. On reflection I agree...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Copy pasta... Once the 6 years are up, check your credit history with the 3 credit companies. If all 3 show no debts, then they are statute barred (over 6 years - 5 for Scotland), and will have dropped off your credit file. If you still get letters chasing debts that are statute barred, file them in the bin or send them this letter: Dear Sirs, Re: Statute Barred Account - Numbered - XXXXXXXX You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself. I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 "an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued". I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period". The last acknowledgement to this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed. The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that "continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statue barred could amount to harassment". I await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed. I look forward to your reply. Yours faithfully Sign digitally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 It is actually illegal to pass it over to a debt collector, as you signed the contract with 3 mobile and not the debt collectors.If they do come knocking this is what i did. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=7&ved=0CFMQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fezinearticles.com%2F%3FDebt-Collectors-and-the-Law---Know-Your-Rights%26id%3D3231761&ei=jIveTYO4M5C68gPyjvSfCg&usg=AFQjCNFOjz1qm3Y8f_0CqBQODlqTPNd7ew The link you provided is American and therefore the rules are not the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davyboy Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Go to the CAB for a definitive answer. In the meantime DO NOTHING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.