rubydazzler Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 Storm is definitely a girls name!NOOO! it's so definitely a man's name! Causing damage and mayhem wherever it appears, how much more masculine could a weather front get?? Zephyr might be a girl's name, on the other hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 NOOO! it's so definitely a man's name! Causing damage and mayhem wherever it appears, how much more masculine could a weather front get?? Zephyr might be a girl's name, on the other hand It's not about what it means, it's about the sound of the word, it's just very feminine. , and a pretentious silly one at that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica23 Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 [...] , and a pretentious silly one at that! That's brilliant, thank you for posting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 Complete idiots...They're playing games to impress other like minded pillocks... They are obviously a pair of wannabe hippies who crave media attention, blithering idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InDaHouse Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 I think most folks would be supportive of their children regardless of sexuality, religious views and politics they choose later in life. At what point does a childs right to choose how they develop get superceeded (sp?) by their parents? For example a couple in Toronto are avoiding telling anyone the sex of their baby 'Storm' to avoid any stereotyping by other people and so influence on how the child develops due to sexual stereotyping: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13581835 Maybe a step to far in ensuring a child has complete freedom to develop? this is DISGUSTING! i have read into this story , the parents are exclusively bringing up the two BOYS as girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatman Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 In an e-mail, Ms Witterick wrote that the idea that "the whole world must know what is between the baby's legs is unhealthy, unsafe, and voyeuristic". I think this says faaaaaaaaaaaaar more about him than anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 I think this says faaaaaaaaaaaaar more about him than anyone else.Shouldn't that be 'her'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miss_luxardo Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 this is DISGUSTING! i have read into this story , the parents are exclusively bringing up the two BOYS as girls. erm.. they aren't bringing up the boys as girls, they have given the boys complete choice of what to wear, how to have their hair, what they pay with etc.. and the boys have long hair, and sometimes wear 'girls' clothes. there's nothing disgusting about it. it just seems a bit weird to the majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatman Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 Shouldn't that be 'her'? C'mon Miss dazzler. Are you so drunk you spot a little sarcasm when you see it.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 Does anyone else feel that if the child turned out to be gay (nothing wrong in that) the parents would celebrate the fact, it would be a dream come true. A lifetime of someone to patronise and teach how hard done by they are. I don't think they'd celebrate if the child was straight though, they'd be slightly disappointed.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.