Should poor people be allowed to grow their own food?

[chem1st]

So given that people do currently own land, and have paid money for it which they had saved in exchange for labour, how do you propose to reach your utopia without stealing the land from the current owners, or rendering land ownership irrelevant (which is the same as stealing the land from the current owners).

 

Nobody owns land, they just own the tenure.

 

You could tackle the problem in multiple ways, you could prosecute them for buying stolen goods or possessing stolen goods. But that would be a bit pointless.

 

You could give them a tax discount.

[S10mainly]

Can you explain lucidly why no one owns land please?

[Cyclone]

Nobody owns land, they just own the tenure.

 

You could tackle the problem in multiple ways, you could prosecute them for buying stolen goods or possessing stolen goods. But that would be a bit pointless.

No you couldn't because under the laws you're talking about no land has been stolen.

 

You could give them a tax discount.

 

Or you could accept that land is now owned and if you want some you'll have to buy it.

[S10mainly]

Buying some land would be "giving in to the regime", also means that a lot of learning about agriculture would have to take place rather fast

[Total Chaos]

i didn't realise there was anything stopping them doing so now

 

Would be a bit hard if you live in the 10th floor flat.

[Aleksandr]

That's silly.

 

We can make new cars, people can buy their own, they aren't stopped from using cars due to the car ownership of others.

The same with the rest of your examples.

I think you've missed my point, or are pretending to. No that is silly!