BettyBooHoo! Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I can see you're struggling. I'll leave you to ponder a little longer. It reads like you're saying that if you are slim and attractive, you can only possibly be seen as a sexual object. Surely that's not what your saying??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Yes, we want a club with gorgeous hunks of men pole dancing, walking around in next to nothing and performing lap dances. Then apply for a licence, get some men, and open one. Women have the same rights as the men you know (equality for all, and all that;)). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 It reads like you're saying that if you are slim and attractive, you can only possibly be seen as a sexual object. Surely that's not what your saying??? In the case put forward by your inference (job description) yes. Otherwise why not inc any woman? By splitting the criteria (ugly/pretty) you objectify. If you didn't objectify the criteria would be woman or man only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celeb Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Who would pay an ugly hairy woman to dance for them? I wouldnt, and would definatley have a wobbly at the management for employing her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxforcefive Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Then apply for a licence, get some men, and open one. Women have the same rights as the men you know (equality for all, and all that;)). Nah, can't be doing with the hairy ugly women protesters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BettyBooHoo! Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 In the case put forward by your inference (job description) yes. Otherwise why not inc any woman? By splitting the criteria (ugly/pretty) you objectify. If you didn't objectify the criteria would be woman or man only. No, what I was saying is that if you don't fit the job description, then it's highly unlikely you will get the job isn't it. I don't fit the job description for heart surgeon but i'd love to crack at it. Is it unfair that I wouldn't get the job or is it just common sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Nah, can't be doing with the hairy ugly women protesters Surely it would be the mens turn to protest, not the womens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxforcefive Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Surely it would be the mens turn to protest, not the womens? Can't see it somehow, can you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 and would definatley have a wobbly You like fat women? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 No, what I was saying is that if you don't fit the job description, then it's hoghly unlikely you will get the job isn't it. I don't fit the job description for heart surgeon but i'd love to crack at it. Is it unfair that I wouldn't get the job or is it just common sense? You can be born unattractive and aspire to a brain surgeon. Unattractive and strutting your booty as a career seems to be an aspiration a little too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.