chem1st Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Because your economic theories are pants, clearly. I'm surprised many on here can't differentiate between the posts of mine which are serious, and those designed to point out the absurdities of the current system by being themselves somewhat absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I feel you're confusing chem1st with Streamline. Oh dear - chem1st, if you're reading this, I'm sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plekhanov Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I know the difference between an able bodied person who is capable and one who is not. What I'm implying is who or you or I for that matter to judge on who is unattractive or not? What a bizarre point. Those who do the hiring in the sex industry I expect hire those they think will bring money in, this may or may not coincide with what they personally find attractive. I'm not aware that the sex industry makes any claims to be choosing objectively "attractive" people but even if hirers in it did so, what of it? You may be able to write into law for obvious reasons a disability because that disability is blatantly obvious. Being unattractive isn't obvious..or is it? And who quantifies that? Is there a special criteria? Honestly you tell me what unattractive is, whatever your reply the answer would be...well that's your own interpretation. Yes and? Judging beauty or sexiness is clearly incredibly subjective, so what? I understand your logic regards amputee, dwarf, etc..But defining our looks by spending a fiver on dodgy DVD would have 99% of the worlds population down as munters, as a rule of thumb. I may not have got my own specifics spot on by I know where i'm coming from..even though you have jogged a few issues. So what if 99.99999999% of people are "munters" by the standards of the sex industry (though actually I think it's far lower than 99%) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 What feminists need to accept is that there are plenty of women who love displaying themselves as much as men like looking at them. Both of them groups of women should be at home. The feminists shouldn't be out protesting, and the bunny girls shouldn't be out flaunting their stuff. They have tumble dryers and allsorts nowadays for them to keep themselves occupied whilst they wait for their husbands to finish work, so they can ut his tea on ready for when he gets home! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 ..are we talking dungarees or hot pants here? Here we are trying to have an intelligent (well they are) informed debate about a serious issue and you turn up and take the pee... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Oh dear - chem1st, if you're reading this, I'm sorry! ..bit late now fella, he'll have taken his bat home though hopefully not to the nearest Playboy club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Here we are trying to have an intelligent (well they are) informed debate about a serious issue and you turn up and take the pee... At least I do sit down ones...like my sistas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 At least I do sit down ones...like my sistas! Oh dear, in my time I've escorted a few ladies out who did the standing up type. Happy days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plekhanov Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I never said you could if "you're stupid and clumsy". Being thick doesn't stop you from aspiring no matter your capacity. Who says they don't have the physical attributes? You? me? Hello mag? or a porn DVD? I didn't single it out..the discussion is about the porn/sex industry. Just as being hideously ugly doesn't stop you from aspiring to be a main stream sex worker or a matinee idol, it simply means you are bound to fail. Why is it a problem that those born without the looks to make it in the mainstream sex industry are excluding from it but not those who are born without the coordination or intelligence needed to become a brain surgeon? I was born without the eyes I would have needed to become a pilot, which is something as a kid I quite wanted to do, does this mean that the air industry is immoral? If not then why is it a problem that not all people could possibly make it in the mainstream sex industry even if they wanted to? Your objections to the sex industry apply equally to every field of human endeavour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I reckon at the next "Meet" we should go to Spearmint Rhinos. For research purposes, of course... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.