leelister6 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 You're way off, she moved it to general discussions, this is the right place for it. Is it really that big a deal?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riche Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 You're way off, she moved it to general discussions, this is the right place for it. Thats me busted, see ya in another week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostrider Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Well, at least the prisoner now has official permission to be a tosser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riche Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Well, at least the prisoner now has official permission to be a tosser Will he provide support for the poor kid? Would you want the kid to have owt to do with the looser. POOR KID , mother is a fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostrider Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Will he provide support for the poor kid? Would you want the kid to have owt to do with the looser. POOR KID , mother is a fool. Of course he wont, its just for extra dole money for fags and stella.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medusa Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Is it really that big a deal?! If you saw how many hundreds of threads are started in Sheffield Discussions which should be elsewhere on a weekly basis (all of which need moving manually by someone on the mod team) then you'd understand that yes, it's a pretty big deal in terms of the amount of needless work it creates for the moderating team. It could all be prevented by just starting the thread in the right forum in the first place, couldn't it? Of course, I could endorse going back to the old school way of dealing with this, which was that if the user had more than 50 posts all threads started in the wrong place just got deleted rather than moved. It rubbed people up the wrong way, but it worked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenyweeny Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 why should people behind bars have same rights as someone walking free in our society,surley they should have to give most things up.fathering a child should be one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I think this is more about the rights of the woman who is not behind bars than it is the man who is behind bars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenyweeny Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 I think this is more about the rights of the woman who is not behind bars than it is the man who is behind bars. i should think she could find a better donor,and possibly someone that can be around for the child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathAxe Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 "human rights" nonsense strikes again. Welcome to the UK, where criminals get put in 5 star hotels, while other criminals walk the streets; meanwhile police are out making money from fines with a complete disregard to public safety. Is it any wonder people like to come live over here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.