Peas Maker Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Why was the case made a state secret for 70 years ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabuckle Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Same reasons why 9-11 cctv evidence has never been shown to the public. Its would give the game away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macbeth Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Something to do with it being such a transparent suicide that they do not feel the need to let anyone look at it again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppins Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Same reasons why 9-11 cctv evidence has never been shown to the public. Its would give the game away! I've seen hours of 911 cctv tape, where have you been Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Same reasons why 9-11 cctv evidence has never been shown to the public. Its would give the game away! Ludo? Or Scrabble? Or possibly Cluedo:suspect: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peas Maker Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Ludo? Or Scrabble? Or possibly Cluedo:suspect: Attorney General Dominic Grieve has ruled out asking the High Court to order a new inquest into the death of weapons expert Dr David Kelly. The scientist's body was found in woods close to his Oxfordshire home in 2003, shortly after he was named as the source of a BBC report casting doubt on the government's claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction capable of being fired within 45 minutes. An inquiry by Lord Hutton in 2004 concluded he had committed suicide, but a campaigning group of doctors denounced it as a "whitewash", claiming the verdict was a cover-up. In a statement to the Commons on 9 June 2011, Mr Grieve backed the original inquiry's findings telling MPs the evidence that Dr Kelly took his own life was "overwhelmingly strong". He said: "There is nothing I have seen that supports any allegation that Dr Kelly was murdered or that his death was the subject of any kind of conspiracy or cover-up. "In my view, no purpose would be served by my making an application to the High Court for an inquest, and indeed I have no reasonable basis for doing so." Who are these doctors in this article ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peas Maker Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_commons/newsid_9508000/9508713.stm Link to BBC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabuckle Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 I've seen hours of 911 cctv tape, where have you been Have you ever seen a plane hit the pentagon??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Who are these doctors in this article ? At a rough guess, they are all Doctors. And pretty good ones at that. Who are you, by the way? You have a familiar posting style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Have you ever seen a plane hit the pentagon??? You haven't. And you haven't any evidence that one didn't, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.