Cyclone Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 So this shrinking load of bread and advertising small 'crates' of lager is all a tory plot to tax the poor. I think the OP has got tax and government on the brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handypandy Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 The whole world bases its economics on growth. Infinite growth with finite resources isn’t and never has been possible. It is only possible for one sector to have growth at the expense of another. If a company made ‘x’ amount of profit last year, the shareholders will be pushing for ‘x+y%’ this year. In reality, the only way this can happen, is by your competitors losing that equivalent ‘y%’, or you finding new markets or new product, where your sales can relieve another sector of some of their income. In this country, probably due to our own arrogance, a lot of us, have for a generation or more, paid ourselves more than we are worth. Devaluation of our currency to remain competitive and paying ludicrous amounts of tax to foot the domestic bill, has been the only way of levelling this out. So whether its Harold Wilson devaluing the pound overnight or the more recent printing of more money, it all amounts to the same. The pound in our pocket buys less because we haven’t actually earned it. Inevitably, the poor suffer the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Growth doesn't just mean an increase in production though, it means progress as well, and what's to say that we will run out of the natural resources here before we're capable of accessing the natural resources elsewhere (like the moon for example, or further afield). You're analysis about profit is flawed as well, another way to increase profit is to improve efficiency of production, through progress (ie a new technique for manufacturing things). Although what you describe happens as well, you don't see many steam engine companies still producing a healthy profit for example, but that doesn't make us all poorer for it, they lost out as better alternatives became available and purchases and investment shifted towards the companies making the new products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 I think the OP has got tax and government on the brain. I have a feeling that actually thinking taxes the OPs brain:D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Erikson Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 It's all to do with the fact there's more people competing for what was once just for the few. As other countries get richer we will struggle. It will get worse too. But yes, lets blame the Government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 But yes, lets blame the Government. Oh, OK then. It's all the governments fault (though I have no idea why on this occasion). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Hmm, who was in government when this happened? Shrinking Mars bar: Size cut by 7.2% but price stays the same 3rd June 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1190395/Shrinking-Mars-bar-Size-cut-7-2-price-stays-same.html And what about house prices? If your debt is increasing and your wage is decreasing, stop buying crates of ale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 I have a feeling that actually thinking taxes the OPs brain:D. Another Tory stealth tax, no doubt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handypandy Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Growth doesn't just mean an increase in production though, it means progress as well, and what's to say that we will run out of the natural resources here before we're capable of accessing the natural resources elsewhere (like the moon for example, or further afield). You're analysis about profit is flawed as well, another way to increase profit is to improve efficiency of production, through progress (ie a new technique for manufacturing things). Although what you describe happens as well, you don't see many steam engine companies still producing a healthy profit for example, but that doesn't make us all poorer for it, they lost out as better alternatives became available and purchases and investment shifted towards the companies making the new products. Forgive me if I’m not thinking so far ahead regarding raping the resources of other planets ! Whilst I’ll accept your argument regarding increased efficiency and new techniques, for the most part these are generally short lived, as your competitors usually also have the new techniques and technology, so you are back to square one. Take my own business as an example. If I could go back to when I first started work in the 60’s with the power tools that I have at my disposal now, I could make a mint. However, today, every workman has the same equipment, so clearly, whilst a lot of jobs may get done in a quarter of the time.........we only get paid for that time, not the time it would have took in the 60’s. Am I making sense here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crookesey Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 If you do what the Labour stalwart Ricky Tomlinson advises, you will be quids in, albeit nearing death from food additives. Long live (or is it shortly die) FARMFOODS rule, OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.