Greavsy Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Where in my post did I say it was okay exactly? Once is a mistake, twice however is absolute stupidity! I hate to think how much those dogs must have suffered. He shouldn't be allowed animals in his care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 From the stories coming out it sounds like the guy has mental health issues and it should have been picked up way back. What were his supriors thinking? It seems that way. In a way, this could have been prevented. Seems there has been a major failing in the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 He was also in contact to know the consequences, at what point do you think this person became suicidal, before or after he knew the dogs fate??. Nothing to prove he made a suicide attempt as well. And you know this, how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Total hysteria on SF because 2 dogs die but no empathy for the attempted suicide and distess of a fellow human being. If it was the first time that he'd caused death to an animal in very similar circumstance, I'd be inclined to agree. As this is his second dog killing, I have no sympathy, what-so-ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 It seems that way. Or he's "putting it on" to escape punishment/loss of pension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Or he's "putting it on" to escape punishment/loss of pension. A bit over-the-top, don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex3659 Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 And you know this, how? By reading the reports. And you know different how?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 A bit over-the-top, don't you think? Not really. Seems perfectly plausible to me. Fine before, kills dogs, develops "mental health issues", discharged as sick with full pension rights and is unfit to stand trial due to "mental health issues". He knows he was looking down the barrel of a prison sentence (especially considering he has previous for the same offence). He took the easy option of jumping from a colleague's moving car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 By reading the reports. And you know different how?. Please quote those sources. Having looked at the most recent story, there is no indication within to point to your theory. Maybe I am reading different stories to you, so it would be of a huge help. Self harm and throwing one's self from a moving vehicle are not the actions of a rational person. You wouldn't do that if you weren't having some sort of mental breakdown. The fact that the officer went absent from duty beforehand seems to indicate there was something amiss, and add the story about the injuries. It does appear it's more than a case of making it up. Besides, people don't sectioned for no reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex3659 Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Not really. Seems perfectly plausible to me. Fine before, kills dogs, develops "mental health issues", discharged as sick with full pension rights and is unfit to stand trial due to "mental health issues". He knows he was looking down the barrel of a prison sentence (especially considering he has previous for the same offence). He took the easy option of jumping from a colleague's moving car. Spot on totally agree, either way the police authorities are wrong for allowing this tv celeb come dog handler anywhere near a dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.