clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 I happen to to know that in 9 out of 10 custody cases, they give the kid to the Mother. You are not wrong. It is supposed to be in the childs best interests. Fathers are dragged through the mud, degraded and humiliated and left skint. Whilst the Mother dosent need any checks. She is never in question! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 If a seperated father/mother takes his/her children on the weekends and looks after them 2/7s of the time, surely he/she should get 2/7s of the child benefit/tax credits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 If a seperated father/mother takes his/her children on the weekends and looks after them 2/7s of the time, surely he/she should get 2/7s of the child benefit/tax credits. You would think so wouldnt you but you get a very slight and i mean slight reduction in CSA payment something along the lines of 4%. I will get the exact csa calculator for you. ie time spent with kids = CSA payment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 here you go Chem1st https://www2.dwp.gov.uk/csa/v2/en/calculate-maintenance.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 This man should not be in a jail never mind cat A jail with murderers and rapists all for the sake of loving his son. again what did this man do? IF he broke the law then again he has to face the consequences Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 here you go Chem1st https://www2.dwp.gov.uk/csa/v2/en/calculate-maintenance.asp I read the pdf on the other page; http://www.csa.gov.uk/en/PDF/leaflets/new/CSL303.pdf If CSA is £70 without access (for two children, non resident parent on £350 per week before tax salary). without access = £70 with 1 day per week access = £60 with 2 day per week access = £50 with 3 day per week access = £40 Equal care = CSA divided by 2, £7 knocked off for every child. In this case, it would work out at £21. So for equal care, you have to pay the person who holds the title of 'parent with care' (this means claims the child benefit). It's a complete blooming shambles, one parent can receive child benefit and CSA, and become eligible for the tax credits, for 'equal care'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 again what did this man do? IF he broke the law then again he has to face the consequences He was charged with harrassment for the balloons and intimidating his ex with a banner saying happy birthday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 I read the pdf on the other page; http://www.csa.gov.uk/en/PDF/leaflets/new/CSL303.pdf If CSA is £70 without access (for two children, non resident parent on £350 per week before tax salary). without access = £70 with 1 day per week access = £60 with 2 day per week access = £50 with 3 day per week access = £40 Equal care = CSA divided by 2, £7 knocked off for every child. In this case, it would work out at £21. So for equal care, you have to pay the person who holds the title of 'parent with care' (this means claims the child benefit). It's a complete blooming shambles, one parent can receive child benefit and CSA, and become eligible for the tax credits, for 'equal care'. And the other loses everything !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 He was charged with harrassment for the balloons and intimidating his ex with a banner saying happy birthday Given that there was a court order banning him from contact with the child, a jail sentence would seem appropriate. It is, arguably, contempt of court to breach any court order. Which only brings us back to "why was the court order imposed?" and nobody knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Given that there was a court order banning him from contact with the child, a jail sentence would seem appropriate. It is, arguably, contempt of court to breach any court order. Which only brings us back to "why was the court order imposed?" and nobody knows. You really think a stint in a Cat A prison is appropriate? And like i said before family courts are secret so we prob never find out and mums word is good enough as evidence she can accuse of whatecer she wants with no evidence. If some one told you you couldnt see your child would you not do anything you could even just for a glimps for a minute. I know I would and have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.